Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318329›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2018

[Arthroscopic fracture treatment of the shoulder joint].

C Gerhardt, L J Lehmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C GerhardtKlinik für Unfall- und Handchirurgie, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Südendstr. 32, 76135, Karlsruhe, Deutschland. christian.gerhardt@t-online.de.
L J LehmannKlinik für Unfall- und Handchirurgie, ViDia Christliche Kliniken Karlsruhe, St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Südendstr. 32, 76135, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the understanding of shoulder fractures has changed due to the progress of arthroscopy. In addition to the cosmetic result, the access morbidity, particularly the integrity of the subscapularis muscle in glenoid and scapular fractures, must be mentioned as an advantage of a minimally invasive approach. Furthermore, necessary secondary interventions, e. g. hook plate removal, can be prevented or minimized by modern implants and arthroscopic techniques.However, the available data and publications are almost exclusively limited to technical notes or small case series, so statements about faster recreation or potential reduction of infection risk cannot be made. Whether addressing concomitant injuries has an effect on the clinical and functional outcome is also unclear at the present time.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyBone PlatesClavicleFracture Fixation, InternalGlenoid CavityHumansLigaments, ArticularPostoperative CareRotator CuffShoulder DislocationShoulder FracturesArthroscopyGlenoid cavityRotator cuffScapulaShoulder fractures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.