Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318284›Full record

ArticleJAMA2018

Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

US Preventive Services Task Force, David C Grossman, Susan J Curry, Douglas K Owens, Michael J Barry, Karina W Davidson, Chyke A Doubeni, John W Epling, Alex R Kemper, Alex H Krist and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Cancer and mortality risks of patients with scoliosis from radiation exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Does research activity reflect the population burden of scoliosis? A bibliometric analysis of etiologic subtypes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Extending convolutional neural networks to detect differences in symmetry in videorasterstereographic back scans with the aim to improve screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

US Preventive Services Task Force
David C GrossmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Susan J CurryUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City.
Douglas K OwensVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Michael J BarryHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Karina W DavidsonColumbia University, New York, New York.
Chyke A DoubeniUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
John W EplingVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke.
Alex R KemperNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Alex H KristFairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia.
Ann E KurthYale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
C Seth LandefeldUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Carol M MangioneUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Maureen G PhippsBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Michael SilversteinBoston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Melissa A SimonNorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Chien-Wen TsengUniversity of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Harvard University · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Iowa · USBrown University · USCarilion Clinic · USColumbia University · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, a lateral curvature of the spine of unknown cause with a Cobb angle of at least 10°, occurs in children and adolescents aged 10 to 18 years. Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common form and usually worsens during adolescence before skeletal maturity. Severe spinal curvature may be associated with adverse long-term health outcomes (eg, pulmonary disorders, disability, back pain, psychological effects, cosmetic issues, and reduced quality of life). Early identification and effective treatment of mild scoliosis could slow or stop curvature progression before skeletal maturity, thereby improving long-term outcomes in adulthood. Objective: To update the 2004 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for idiopathic scoliosis in asymptomatic adolescents. Evidence Review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Findings: The USPSTF found no direct evidence on screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and health outcomes and no evidence on the harms of screening. The USPSTF found inadequate evidence on treatment with exercise and surgery. It found adequate evidence that treatment with bracing may slow curvature progression in adolescents with mild or moderate curvature severity (Cobb angle <40° to 50°); however, evidence on the association between reduction in spinal curvature in adolescence and long-term health outcomes in adulthood is inadequate. The USPSTF found inadequate evidence on the harms of treatment. Therefore, the USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient and that the balance of benefits and harms of screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cannot be determined. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents aged 10 to 18 years. (I statement).

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicPreventive MedicineAdolescentAdvisory CommitteesBracesChildFemaleHumansMaleScoliosisSensitivity and SpecificityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29318284
OpenAlexW2782784206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.