Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318250›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2018

Razor-printed sticker microdevices for cell-based applications.

Loren E Stallcop, Yasmín R Álvarez-García, Ana M Reyes-Ramos, Karla P Ramos-Cruz, Molly M Morgan, Yatao Shi, Lingjun Li, David J Beebe, Maribella Domenech, Jay W Warrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid Prototyping of Multilayer Microphysiological Systems.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Loren E StallcopDept. of Materials Science - Madison, Univ. of Wisconsin - Madison, WI, USA.
Yasmín R Álvarez-García
Ana M Reyes-Ramos
Karla P Ramos-Cruz
Molly M Morgan
Yatao Shi
Lingjun Li
David J Beebe
Maribella Domenech
Jay W Warrick

Funding

Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
Molecular & Environmental Toxicology Pre-& Postdoctoral Training ProgramT32ES007015 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHRISTOPHER A BRADFIELD · 1985 to 2026
$11.5M
MECHANISMS OF CONSTITUTIVE NF KB ACTIVITYR01CA081065 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MIYAMOTO, SHIGEKI · 1999 to 2007
$2.5M
Enabling NF-kB Signal Transduction Studies in Primary Multiple Myeloma CellsR01CA155192 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J, MIYAMOTO, SHIGEKI · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
In Situ Protein Characterization and Visualization in the Brains of Mouse Models for AutismR56MH110215 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI IKONOMIDOU, HRISSANTHI, LI, LINGJUN · 2017 to 2018
$752k
A tumor-mesenchymal in vitro model of Hedgehog signaling in triple negative breasK01CA188167 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MAYAGUEZ · PI DOMENECH, MARIBELLA · 2014 to 2017
$455k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA188167NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081065NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155192NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007015NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH110215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tape-based razor-printing is a flexible and affordable ultra-rapid prototyping approach for microscale device fabrication. However, integration of this prototyping approach into cell-based assay development has been limited to proof of principle demonstrations. This is in large part due to lack of an established or well-characterized option for biocompatible adhesive tape. Without such an option, integration of these areas will remain unexplored. Therefore, to address this critical hurdle, we characterized microscale devices made using a potentially biocompatible double-sided adhesive, ARCare 90106. We validated tape-based device performance against 96-well plates and PDMS microdevices with respect to cell viability, hydrophobic small molecule sequestration, the potential for leaching compounds, use in fluorescence microscopy, and outgassing (bubble formation). Results supported the tape as a promising tool for future cell-based assay development. Therefore, we subsequently demonstrated specific strengths enabled by the ultra-rapid (<1 h per prototype) and affordable (∼$1200 cutting plotter, <$0.05 per prototype) approach. Specifically, data demonstrate the ability to integrate disparate materials for advanced sticker-device functionality such as bonding of polystyrene devices to glass substrates for microscopy applications, inclusion of membranes, and incorporation of different electrospun biomaterials into a single device. Likewise, the approach allowed rapid adoption by uninitiated users. Overall, this study provides a necessary and unique contribution to the largely separate fields of tape-based razor-printing and cell-based microscale assay development by addressing a critical barrier to widespread integration and adoption while also demonstrating the potential for new and future applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCytological TechniquesEquipment DesignHumansMiceMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicroscopy, FluorescencePrintingReproducibility of ResultsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID29318250
PMCPMC5821501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.