Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29318152›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2017

Snake Venom PLA

Huixiang Xiao, Hong Pan, Keren Liao, Mengxue Yang, Chunhong Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The many dimeric faces of Lys49 PLAProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huixiang Xiao *Department of Biochemistry, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Hong Pan *Department of Biochemistry, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Keren LiaoDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Mengxue YangDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Chunhong HuangDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-4355
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenomation is a neglected global health problem, causing substantial mortality, disability, and psychological morbidity, especially in rural tropical and subtropical zones. Antivenin is currently the only specific medicine for envenomation. However, it is restricted by cold storage, snakebite diagnosis, and high price. Snake venom phospholipase A

Indexed as

AntiveninsAnimalsDrug StabilityHumansPhospholipase A2 InhibitorsPhospholipases A2Snake VenomsAntiveninsPhospholipase A2 InhibitorsPhospholipases A2Snake Venoms

Identifiers

PMID29318152
PMCPMC5727668
OpenAlexW2773445094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.