Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317712›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

MUC4 immunohistochemistry is useful in distinguishing epithelioid mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Amany Sayed Mawas, Vishwa Jeet Amatya, Kei Kushitani, Yuichiro Kai, Yoshihiro Miyata, Morihito Okada, Yukio Takeshima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on the pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.Translational lung cancer research · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Reply to 'MUC4 staining in sarcomatoid carcinomas' by Berg et al.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Amany Sayed MawasDepartment of Pathology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Vishwa Jeet AmatyaDepartment of Pathology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4986-2109
Kei KushitaniDepartment of Pathology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuichiro KaiDepartment of Pathology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yoshihiro MiyataDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Morihito OkadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukio TakeshimaDepartment of Pathology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan. ykotake@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma from lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma requires the positive and negative immunohistochemical markers of mesothelioma. The IMIG guideline has suggested the use of Calretinin, D2-40, WT1, and CK5/6 as mesothelial markers, TTF-1, Napsin-A, Claudin 4, CEA as lung adenocarcinoma markers p40, p63, CK5/6, MOC-31 as squamous cell markers. However, use of other immunohistochemical markers is still necessary. We evaluated 65 epithelioid mesotheliomas, 60 adenocarcinomas, and 57 squamous cell carcinomas of the lung for MUC4 expression by immunohistochemistry and compared with the previously known immunohistochemical markers. MUC4 expression was not found in any of 65 cases of epithelioid mesothelioma. In contrast, MUC4 expression was observed in 50/60(83.3%) cases of lung adenocarcinoma and 50/56(89.3%) cases of lung squamous cell carcinoma. The negative MUC4 expression showed 100% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity and accuracy rate of 91.2% to differentiate epithelioid mesothelioma from lung carcinoma. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MUC4 are comparable to that of previously known markers of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, namely CEA, Claudin 4 and better than that of MOC-31. In conclusion, MUC4 immunohistochemistry is useful for differentiation of epithelioid mesothelioma from lung carcinoma, either adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCalbindin 2Carcinoma, Squamous CellDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsMaleMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantBiomarkers, TumorCALB2 protein, humanCalbindin 2MUC4 protein, humanMucin-4

Identifiers

PMID29317712
PMCPMC5760602
OpenAlexW2781872411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.