Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Conservation of pattern as a tool for inference on spatial snapshots in ecological data.

Michael A Irvine, James C Bull, Matt J Keeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A IrvineInstitute of Applied Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z2, Canada. m.irvine@math.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-8998
James C BullDepartment of Biosciences, Wallace Building, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. j.c.bull@swansea.ac.uk.
Matt J KeelingZeeman Institute (SBIDER), Maths Institute & School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK. m.j.keeling@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-4765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As climate change and other anthropogenic factors increase the uncertainty of vegetation ecosystem persistence, the ability to rapidly assess their dynamics is paramount. Vegetation and sessile communities form a variety of striking regular spatial patterns such as stripes, spots and labyrinths, that have been used as indicators of ecosystem current state, through qualitative analysis of simple models. Here we describe a new method for rigorous quantitative estimation of biological parameters from a single spatial snapshot. We formulate a synthetic likelihood through consideration of the expected change in the correlation structure of the spatial pattern. This then allows Bayesian inference to be performed on the model parameters, which includes providing parameter uncertainty. The method was validated against simulated data and then applied to real data in the form of aerial photographs of seagrass banding. The inferred parameters were found to be able to reproduce similar patterns to those observed and able to detect strength of spatial competition, competition-induced mortality and the local range of reproduction. This technique points to a way of performing rapid inference of spatial competition and ecological stability from a single spatial snapshots of sessile communities.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcologyEcosystemModels, TheoreticalAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID29317656
PMCPMC5760736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.