Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317554›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2018

Bendamustine plus Rituximab Versus R-CHOP as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3A: Evidence from a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Patrizia Mondello, Normann Steiner, Wolfgang Willenbacher, Claudio Cerchione, Davide Nappi, Endri Mauro, Simone Ferrero, Salvatore Cuzzocrea, Michael Mian

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Follicular lymphoma: updates for pathologists.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine-Rituximab in Treatment Naïve Symptomatic Follicular Lymphoma: An Institutional Analysis.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patrizia MondelloDepartment of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy patriziamondello@hotmail.it.
Normann SteinerInternal Medicine V: Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9829-1309
Wolfgang WillenbacherInternal Medicine V: Hematology & Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Claudio CerchioneHaematology Division, "Federico II" University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Davide NappiHaematology Division, "Federico II" University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Endri MauroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pordenone General Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.
Simone FerreroDepartment of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, Division of Hematology AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino,", Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-1502
Salvatore CuzzocreaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Michael MianHaematology Division, "Federico II" University Hospital, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2539-5996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) has been demonstrated to improve outcomes and reduce toxicity compared with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in follicular lymphoma (FL). Nevertheless, in clinical practice, many centers still prefer R-CHOP to R-B in patients with FL grade 3A (FL3A). Therefore, we retrospectively assessed patients with FL3A treated with either R-CHOP or R-B in five European cancer centers and compared their outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively assessed 132 patients affected by FL grade 3A treated with either R-B or R-CHOP in the first line and evaluated outcome and toxicity according to the type of treatment. This study included 101 patients who were a subgroup of a previously published cohort.

resultsR-B was less toxic and achieved a similar percentage of complete remissions compared with R-CHOP (97% vs. 96%,

conclusionR-B as a first-line treatment of FL3A is better tolerated than R-CHOP and seems to induce more profound responses, leading to a significantly lower relapse rate and prolonged PFS. Therefore, R-B is a valid treatment option for FL grade 3A. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Rituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) has shown to be less toxic and more effective than rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in follicular lymphoma grade 3A. Although both regimens can induce a complete remission in >95% of patients, relapses occur more frequently after R-CHOP than R-B, leading to a significantly longer progression-free survival in the latter. R-B is also able to overcome the impact of negative prognosticators, such as BCL2 expression. However, because of the indolent course of this disease and efficient salvage treatments, overall survival was similar in both treatment groups. Therefore, R-B is a valid treatment option in this patient setting.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBendamustine HydrochlorideCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinHumansLymphoma, FollicularMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrednisoneProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6Retrospective StudiesRituximabSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeBCL2 protein, humanBCL6 protein, humanBendamustine HydrochlorideCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6RituximabBendamustineFollicular lymphomagrade 3ARituximab

Identifiers

PMID29317554
PMCPMC5896707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.