Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317537›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Dual evolutionary origin of insect wings supported by an investigation of the abdominal wing serial homologs in

David M Linz, Yoshinori Tomoyasu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Loss, persistence and reversal of phenotypic traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Grand challenges in insect systematics.Frontiers in insect science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The wing imaginal disc.Genetics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. ThemicroPublication biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The miR-9b microRNA mediates dimorphism and development of wing in aphids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Evolutionary history of Polyneoptera and its implications for our understanding of early winged insects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Specification and Patterning ofJournal of developmental biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M LinzDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056.
Yoshinori TomoyasuDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056 tomoyay@miamioh.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-3454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of insect wings is still a highly debated mystery in biology, despite the importance of this evolutionary innovation. There are currently two prominent, but contrasting wing origin hypotheses (the tergal origin hypothesis and the pleural origin hypothesis). Through studies in the

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenes, InsectWings, AnimalAnimalsGenes, HomeoboxTriboliumHoxinsect wingsmorphological noveltyserial homologyTribolium

Identifiers

PMID29317537
PMCPMC5789912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.