Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317382›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2018

Accurate Influenza Monitoring and Forecasting Using Novel Internet Data Streams: A Case Study in the Boston Metropolis.

Fred Sun Lu, Suqin Hou, Kristin Baltrusaitis, Manan Shah, Jure Leskovec, Rok Sosic, Jared Hawkins, John Brownstein, Giuseppe Conidi, Julia Gunn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Early Warning of Infectious Disease Outbreaks Using Social Media and Digital Data: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modeling COVID-19 incidence with Google Trends.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fred Sun LuComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-5734
Suqin HouHarvard Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-3839
Kristin BaltrusaitisDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-9513
Manan ShahComputer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8865-6896
Jure LeskovecComputer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-923X
Rok SosicComputer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0723-9172
Jared HawkinsComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-1618
John BrownsteinComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8568-5317
Giuseppe ConidiBoston Public Health Commission, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-5791
Julia GunnBoston Public Health Commission, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1606-3682
Josh GrayathenaResearch, athenahealth, Watertown, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-621X
Anna ZinkathenaResearch, athenahealth, Watertown, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5752-1569
Mauricio SantillanaComputational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4206-418X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza outbreaks pose major challenges to public health around the world, leading to thousands of deaths a year in the United States alone. Accurate systems that track influenza activity at the city level are necessary to provide actionable information that can be used for clinical, hospital, and community outbreak preparation.

objectiveAlthough Internet-based real-time data sources such as Google searches and tweets have been successfully used to produce influenza activity estimates ahead of traditional health care-based systems at national and state levels, influenza tracking and forecasting at finer spatial resolutions, such as the city level, remain an open question. Our study aimed to present a precise, near real-time methodology capable of producing influenza estimates ahead of those collected and published by the Boston Public Health Commission (BPHC) for the Boston metropolitan area. This approach has great potential to be extended to other cities with access to similar data sources.

methodsWe first tested the ability of Google searches, Twitter posts, electronic health records, and a crowd-sourced influenza reporting system to detect influenza activity in the Boston metropolis separately. We then adapted a multivariate dynamic regression method named ARGO (autoregression with general online information), designed for tracking influenza at the national level, and showed that it effectively uses the above data sources to monitor and forecast influenza at the city level 1 week ahead of the current date. Finally, we presented an ensemble-based approach capable of combining information from models based on multiple data sources to more robustly nowcast as well as forecast influenza activity in the Boston metropolitan area. The performances of our models were evaluated in an out-of-sample fashion over 4 influenza seasons within 2012-2016, as well as a holdout validation period from 2016 to 2017.

resultsOur ensemble-based methods incorporating information from diverse models based on multiple data sources, including ARGO, produced the most robust and accurate results. The observed Pearson correlations between our out-of-sample flu activity estimates and those historically reported by the BPHC were 0.98 in nowcasting influenza and 0.94 in forecasting influenza 1 week ahead of the current date.

conclusionsWe show that information from Internet-based data sources, when combined using an informed, robust methodology, can be effectively used as early indicators of influenza activity at fine geographic resolutions.

Indexed as

communicable diseasesepidemiologyinfluenza, humanmachine learningpatient generated datapublic healthregression analysisstatistics

Identifiers

PMID29317382
PMCPMC5780615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.