Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317377›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)

Multiparametric MRI for the detection of local recurrence of prostate cancer in the setting of biochemical recurrence after low dose rate brachytherapy.

Luca F Valle, Matthew D Greer, Joanna H Shih, Tristan Barrett, Yan Mee Law, Andrew B Rosenkrantz, Haytham Shebel, Akhil Muthigi, Daniel Su, Maria J Merino and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Abbreviated MR Protocols in Prostate MRI.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Comparison of PSMA-basedAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luca F ValleRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Matthew D GreerMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Joanna H ShihBiometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Tristan BarrettDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Yan Mee LawDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Andrew B RosenkrantzDepartment of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Haytham ShebelDepartment of Radiology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt.
Akhil MuthigiUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Daniel SuOrange Country Urology Associates, Laguna Hills, USA.
Maria J MerinoLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Bradford J WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Andra V KrauzeRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Aradhana KaushalRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Barış TürkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Deborah E CitrinRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Center for Interventional OncologyZIDBC011242 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WOOD, BRADFORD J · 2009 to 2025
$18.7M
Targeting mechanisms of radiation resistanceZIABC011552 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CITRIN, DEBORAH · 2014 to 2025
$12.2M
Interventional OncologyZIACL040015 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has utility in detecting post-radiotherapy local recurrence. We conducted a multireader study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of mpMRI for local recurrence after low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy.

methodsA total of 19 patients with biochemical recurrence after LDR brachytherapy underwent 3T endorectal coil mpMRI with T2-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with pathologic confirmation. Prospective reads by an experienced prostate radiologist were compared with reads from 4 radiologists of varying experience. Readers identified suspicious lesions and rated each MRI detection parameter. MRI-detected lesions were considered true-positive with ipsilateral pathologic confirmation. Inferences for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), kappa, and index of specific agreement were made with the use of bootstrap resampling.

resultsPathologically confirmed recurrence was found in 15 of 19 patients. True positive recurrences identified by mpMRI were frequently located in the transition zone (46.7%) and seminal vesicles (30%). On patient-based analysis, average sensitivity of mpMRI was 88% (standard error [SE], 3.5%). For highly suspicious lesions, specificity of mpMRI was 75% (SE, 16.5%). On lesion-based analysis, the average PPV was 62% (SE, 6.7%) for all lesions and 78.7% (SE, 10.3%) for highly suspicious lesions. The average PPV for lesions invading the seminal vesicles was 88.8% (n=13). The average PPV was 66.6% (SE, 5.8%) for lesions identified with T2-weighted imaging, 64.9% (SE, 7.3%) for DCE, and 70% (SE, 7.3%) for DWI.

conclusionThis series provides evidence that mpMRI after LDR brachytherapy is feasible with a high patient-based cancer detection rate. Radiologists of varying experience demonstrated moderate agreement in detecting recurrence.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation DosageReproducibility of ResultsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID29317377
PMCPMC5765929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.