ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2018
Baseline 24-2 Central Visual Field Damage Is Predictive of Global Progressive Field Loss.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual Field Progression in Childhood Glaucoma Versus Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Proportion of Fast Progressors in the Central versus Global Visual Field Across Varying Glaucoma Severity Groups.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Artifacts in Macular and Peripapillary OCT Angiography in Patients with Different Severities of Glaucoma.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Hierarchical Longitudinal Model for Estimation of Central Visual Field Rates of Change in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Predicting 60-4 visual field tests using 3D facial reconstruction.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Foveal avascular zone vessel density is associated with visual field progression in early-stage glaucoma eyes with central visual field damage.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Relationships of Macular Functional Impairment With Structural and Vascular Changes According to Glaucoma Severity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Association of superficial macular vessel density with visual field progression in open-angle glaucoma with central visual field damage.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Fast Progressors in Glaucoma: Prevalence Based on Global and Central Visual Field Loss.Ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Investigation of progression pattern and associated risk factors in glaucoma patients with initial paracentral scotomas using Humphrey 10-2.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Central Visual Field Defects in Patients with Distinct Glaucomatous Optic Disc Phenotypes.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Disc Hemorrhages Are Associated With the Presence and Progression of Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.Journal of glaucoma · 2020Observational
- The Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and Rates of Central Versus Peripheral Visual Field Progression.Journal of glaucoma · 2020Observational
- Rapid Central Visual Field Progression Rate in Eyes with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Choroidal Microvasculature Dropout.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Central visual field in glaucoma: An updated review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Longitudinal Structure-Function Relationship between Macular Vessel Density and Thickness and Central Visual Field in Early Glaucoma.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
- Enhancing Detection of Glaucoma Progression: Utility of 24-2 Visual Field Central Points vs. 10-2 Visual Fields.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCentral visual field (VF) damage in glaucoma patients can significantly hinder daily activities. The present study investigates whether the presence of localized baseline damage to the central 10 degrees of the VF is predictive of faster global mean deviation (MD) progression.
designProspective cohort study.
methodsEyes from the multicenter African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES) with established glaucoma and VF loss and a minimum of 5 24-2 VFs were eligible. Baseline central 24-2 damage was defined as any of the 12 central-most points with total deviation (TD) values at P < 0.5% on 2 consecutive examinations. Progression was determined using trend-based and event-based criteria: (1) rates of MD change significantly faster than zero and (2) >-5 dB MD loss over the entire follow-up.
resultsA total of 827 eyes of 584 patients were studied. Mean rate of MD change of the entire sample was -0.15 dB/year (95% CI: -0.19 to -0.12, P < .001). Eyes with baseline central damage progressed faster than those without (difference: β
conclusionThe presence of central VF damage at baseline is significantly associated with more rapid global progression. Detection of central VF damage aids in stratification of high-risk patients who may need intensive surveillance and aggressive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.