Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317145›Full record

Trial reportClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2018

Evaluation of Quality of Life Outcomes Following Palliative Treatment of Bone Metastases with Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: An International Multicentre Study.

D Harding, S L Giles, M R D Brown, G R Ter Haar, M van den Bosch, L W Bartels, Y-S Kim, M Deppe, N M deSouza

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cost-utility of focused ultrasound compared to radiotherapy for Dutch patients with uncomplicated non-spinal bone metastases.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Therapeutic ultrasound transducer technology and monitoring techniques: a review with clinical examples.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. 3-T magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (3 T-MR-HIFU) for the treatment of pain from bone metastases of solid tumors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Emerging clinical applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

D HardingThe CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, MRI Unit, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
S L GilesThe CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, MRI Unit, Sutton, Surrey, UK. Electronic address: sharon.giles@icr.ac.uk.
M R D BrownPain Medicine Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
G R Ter HaarThe CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, MRI Unit, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
M van den BoschImage Sciences Institute/Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
L W BartelsImage Sciences Institute/Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Y-S KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Radiology, Mint Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
M DeppePhilips MR Therapy, Äyritie 4, 01510 Vantaa, Finland.
N M deSouzaThe CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, MRI Unit, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLPhilips (Finland) · FIRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16464Cancer Research UK C1060/A10334Cancer Research UK C1060/A16464Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0701533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine quality of life (QoL) outcomes after palliation of pain from bone metastases using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-guided HIFU), measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C15-PAL and the QLQ-BM22 questionnaires. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty patients undergoing MR-guided HIFU in an international multicentre trial self-completed the QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BM22 questionnaires before and on days 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 post-treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to represent changes in symptom and functional scales over time and to determine their clinical significance. QoL changes were compared in pain responders and non-responders (who were classified according to change in worst pain score and analgesic intake, between baseline and day 30).

resultsEighteen patients had analysable QoL data. Clinically significant improvements were seen in the QoL scales of physical functioning, fatigue, appetite loss, nausea and vomiting, constipation and pain in the 53% of patients who were classified as responders at day 30. No significant changes were seen in the 47% of patients who were non-responders at this time point.

conclusionLocal treatment of pain from bone metastases with MR-guided HIFU, even in the presence of disseminated malignancy, has a substantial positive effect on physical functioning, and improves other symptomatic QoL measures. This indicated a greater response to treatment over and above pain control alone. MR-guided HIFU is non-invasive and should be considered for patients with localised metastatic bone pain and poor QoL.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedBone NeoplasmsCancer PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonic TherapyBone metastasescancer-induced bone pain (CIBP)high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)magnetic resonance imagingquality of life (QoL)thermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID29317145
PMCPMC5842401
OpenAlexW2781755536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.