Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317078›Full record

ArticleMedical hypotheses2018

The protected survivor model: Using resistant successful cognitive aging to identify protection in the very old.

Jeremy M Silverman, James Schmeidler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical hypotheses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Outcome age-based prediction of successful cognitive aging by total cholesterol.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy M SilvermanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Psychiatry, Box 1230, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, United States; James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Research & Development, Mail Code 151, 130 West Kingsbridge Road, Bronx, NY 10468, United States. Electronic address: jeremy.silverman@mssm.edu.
James SchmeidlerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Psychiatry, Box 1230, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, United States.

Funding

VESICULAR LOCALIZATION AND FUNCTION OF PRESENILIN 1 FRAGMENTP50AG005138 · NIA · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI SCHIMMING, CORBETT · 1985 to 2019
$37.9M
Successful Cogn. Aging and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Central Valley CRR21TW009258 · FIC · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SILVERMAN, JEREMY M. · 2012 to 2013
$253k
Cardiovascular RF and Successful Cognitive Aging in Very Old Male VeteransI01CX000900 · VA · JAMES J PETERS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SILVERMAN, JEREMY M. · 2014 to 2019
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000900FIC NIH HHS R21 TW009258NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For some cardiovascular risk factors, association with risk for cognitive impairment observed in early old age is reduced, or paradoxically even reversed, as age of outcome increases. Successful cognitive aging is intact cognition in the oldest-old; we define resistant successful cognitive aging as successful cognitive aging despite high risk. The protected survivor model posits that a minority of the general population has a protective factor that mitigates the negative effect of a risk factor on successful cognitive aging for the unprotected majority. As age increases, differential failure rates increase the proportion of survivors with protection. Among the unprotected, the proportion with low risk increases, but among those with protection, high risk and low risk do not differ. Due to differential mortality, half the survivors are eventually protected - a majority among those with high risk, and a minority among those with low risk. According to the protective survivor model, an example of Simpson's paradox, the association of the risk factor with survival does not change within an individual, but the association in the surviving population changes as its age increases. We created quantitative illustrations of a simplified protected survivor model applied to successful cognitive aging to explain how the usual association of a risk factor with cognitive decline is reversed in the very old. In the illustrations, probability of subsequent survival was higher for survivors with high risk (mostly protected) than low risk (mostly not protected), an example of Simpson's paradox. Resistance to disease despite the presence of risk factors is consistent with the presence of countervailing protection. Based on the protected survivor model, we hypothesize that studies seeking protective factors against cognitive decline will be more effective by limiting a successful cognitive aging sample to resistant successful cognitive aging - to contrast with a sample without successful cognitive aging.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCardiovascular DiseasesCognitive AgingCognitive DysfunctionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID29317078
PMCPMC5927359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.