Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29317002›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Mobile produce market influences access to fruits and vegetables in an urban environment.

Bi-Sek Hsiao, Lindiwe Sibeko, Kathy Wicks, Lisa M Troy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Local Food Environments, Suburban Development, and BMI: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bi-Sek Hsiao1Department of Nutrition,School of Public Health and Health Sciences,206 Chenoweth Lab,University of Massachusetts,Amherst,MA 01003,USA.
Lindiwe Sibeko1Department of Nutrition,School of Public Health and Health Sciences,206 Chenoweth Lab,University of Massachusetts,Amherst,MA 01003,USA.
Kathy Wicks2Partners for a Healthier Community,Springfield,MA,USA.
Lisa M Troy1Department of Nutrition,School of Public Health and Health Sciences,206 Chenoweth Lab,University of Massachusetts,Amherst,MA 01003,USA.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USCommunity Partners · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the influence of a mobile produce market (MPM) on fruit and vegetable access.

designNovel application of a structured assessment (five dimensions of access framework) to examine fruit and vegetable access through self-administered surveys on shopping behaviours, and perceptions and experiences of shopping at the MPM.

settingLow-income neighbourhoods with limited access to fruits and vegetables. SUBJECTS: Older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59·9 years) shoppers.

resultsParticipants were more likely to be women and non-White, one-third lived alone and nearly half were older adults. Compared with younger, older participants had different shopping behaviours: tended to purchase food for one person (P < 0·001), be long-term shoppers (P=0·002) and use electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards (P=0·012). Older adults were more likely to like the market location (P=0·03), while younger adults were more likely to want changes in location (P=0·04), more activities (P=0·04), taste sampling (P=0·05) and nutritional counselling (P=0·01). The MPM captured all dimensions of access: availability, indicated by satisfaction with the produce variety for nearly one-third of all participants; accessibility, indicated by participants travelling <1 mile (<1·6 km; 72·2 %) and appreciation of location (72·7 %); affordability, indicated by satisfaction with price (47·6 %); acceptability, indicated by appreciation of produce quality (46·2 %); and accommodation, indicated by satisfaction with safety of location (30·1 %) and high EBT use among older adults (41·8 %).

conclusionsMPM may influence fruit and vegetable access in low-income urban neighbourhoods by facilitating the five dimensions of access and may especially benefit older adults and individuals living alone.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesAdolescentAdultAgedChildConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleFood SupplyHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedDietFood environmentFruit and vegetable accessMobile marketsUrban food deserts

Identifiers

PMID29317002
PMCPMC10261273
OpenAlexW2784204933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.