Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316978›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2018

In vivo testing of novel vaccine prototypes against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Fabio Antenucci, Cyrielle Fougeroux, Alannah Deeney, Cathrine Ørskov, Andrew Rycroft, Peter Johannes Holst, Anders Miki Bojesen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review of advanced research on swineFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio AntenucciDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frb. C., 1-20, Building: 301, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cyrielle FougerouxDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology ISIM, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farigmagsgade 5, Bldg 22/23, 1014 København K, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alannah DeeneyDepartment of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK.
Cathrine ØrskovDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 København N, 12.3, Building: 32, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andrew RycroftDepartment of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK.
Peter Johannes HolstDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology ISIM, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farigmagsgade 5, Bldg 22/23, 1014 København K, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders Miki BojesenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frb. C., 1-20, Building: 301, Copenhagen, Denmark. miki@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-0019
University of Copenhagen · DKRoyal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G020744/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (A. pleuropneumoniae) is a Gram-negative bacterium that represents the main cause of porcine pleuropneumonia in pigs, causing significant economic losses to the livestock industry worldwide. A. pleuropneumoniae, as the majority of Gram-negative bacteria, excrete vesicles from its outer membrane (OM), accordingly defined as outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). Thanks to their antigenic similarity to the OM, OMVs have emerged as a promising tool in vaccinology. In this study we describe the in vivo testing of several vaccine prototypes for the prevention of infection by all known A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes. Previously identified vaccine candidates, the recombinant proteins ApfA and VacJ, administered individually or in various combinations with the OMVs, were employed as vaccination strategies. Our data show that the addition of the OMVs in the vaccine formulations significantly increased the specific IgG titer against both ApfA and VacJ in the immunized animals, confirming the previously postulated potential of the OMVs as adjuvant. Unfortunately, the antibody response raised did not translate into an effective protection against A. pleuropneumoniae infection, as none of the immunized groups following challenge showed a significantly lower degree of lesions than the controls. Interestingly, quite the opposite was true, as the animals with the highest IgG titers were also the ones bearing the most extensive lesions in their lungs. These results shed new light on A. pleuropneumoniae pathogenicity, suggesting that antibody-mediated cytotoxicity from the host immune response may play a central role in the development of the lesions typically associated with A. pleuropneumoniae infections.

Indexed as

Actinobacillus InfectionsActinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeAnimalsBacterial VaccinesPleuropneumoniaRecombinant ProteinsSerogroupSwineSwine DiseasesVaccinationBacterial VaccinesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29316978
PMCPMC5761136
OpenAlexW2784114096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.