Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316893›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2018

Frequency of SCA8, SCA10, SCA12, SCA36, FXTAS and C9orf72 repeat expansions in SCA patients negative for the most common SCA subtypes.

Gülsah Aydin, Gabriele Dekomien, Sabine Hoffjan, Wanda Maria Gerding, Jörg T Epplen, Larissa Arning

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Repeat expansions inBrain communications · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Spinocerebellar ataxia: an update.Journal of neurology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gülsah AydinFaculty of Health, University Witten-Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
Gabriele DekomienDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr-University, Gebäude MA5/39, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Sabine HoffjanDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr-University, Gebäude MA5/39, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Wanda Maria GerdingDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr-University, Gebäude MA5/39, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Jörg T EpplenDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr-University, Gebäude MA5/39, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Larissa ArningDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr-University, Gebäude MA5/39, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany. larissa.arning@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8913-5627
Ruhr University Bochum · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) subtypes are often caused by expansions in non-coding regions of genes like SCA8, SCA10, SCA12 and SCA36. Other ataxias are known to be associated with repeat expansions such as fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) or expansions in the C9orf72 gene. When no mutation has been identified in the aforementioned genes next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based diagnostics may also be applied. In order to define an optimal diagnostic strategy, more information about the frequency and phenotypic characteristics of rare repeat expansion disorders associated with ataxia should be at hand.

methodsWe analyzed a consecutive cohort of 440 German unrelated patients with symptoms of cerebellar ataxia, dysarthria and other unspecific symptoms who were referred to our center for SCA diagnostics. They showed alleles in the normal range for the most common SCA subtypes SCA1-3, SCA6, SCA7 and SCA17. These patients were screened for expansions causing SCA8, SCA10, SCA12, SCA36 and FXTAS as well as for the pathogenic hexanucleotide repeat in the C9orf72 gene.

resultsExpanded repeats for SCA10, SCA12 or SCA36 were not identified in the analyzed patients. Five patients showed expanded SCA8 CTA/CTG alleles with 92-129 repeats. One 51-year-old male with unclear dementia symptoms was diagnosed with a large GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72. The analysis of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) revealed one patient with a premutation (>50 CGG repeats) and seven patients with alleles in the grey zone (41 to 54 CGG repeats).

conclusionsAltogether five patients showed 92 or more SCA8 CTA/CTG combined repeats. Our results support the assumption that smaller FMR1 gene expansions could be associated with the risk of developing neurological signs. The results do not support genetic testing for C9orf72 expansion in ataxia patients.

Indexed as

Spinocerebellar AtaxiasAdultAtaxiaC9orf72 ProteinCohort StudiesDNA Repeat ExpansionFemaleFragile X SyndromeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve Tissue ProteinsTremorYoung AdultC9orf72 ProteinC9orf72 protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsC9orf72FxtasRepeat expansionsSCA8Spinocerebellar ataxia

Identifiers

PMID29316893
PMCPMC5761156
OpenAlexW2783996981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.