ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2018
Rho Inhibitor VX-210 in Acute Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Design of the SPinal Cord Injury Rho INhibition InvestiGation (SPRING) Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02669849 (A Phase 2b/3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of VX-210 in Subjects With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2b/3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of VX-210 in Subjects With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for spinal cord injury.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Trial
- Autologous Neural Stem Cell Encapsulation in CT04-Integrated Fibrin Hydrogel Enhances Tissue Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury in Monkeys.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Potential Pharmacologic Treatments in Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Review
- Loss of RhoA in microglia disables glycolytic adaptation and impairs spinal cord injury recovery through Arhgap25/HIF-1α pathway.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Methylprednisolone substituted lipid nanoparticles deliver C3 transferase mRNA for combined treatment of spinal cord injury.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Landscape of Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Histological effects of combined therapy involving scar resection, decellularized scaffolds, and human iPSC-NS/PCs transplantation in chronic complete spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Axonal Regeneration after Spinal Cord Injury: Molecular Mechanisms, Regulatory Pathways, and Novel Strategies.Biology · 2024Review
- Translational Relevance of Secondary Intracellular Signaling Cascades Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Regenerative medicine strategies for chronic complete spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2024Review
- Review
- Neural regeneration in the human central nervous system-from understanding the underlying mechanisms to developing treatments. Where do we stand today?Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Application of nursing intervention based on Snyder's hope theory in individuals with spinal cord injury.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Axonal growth inhibitors and their receptors in spinal cord injury: from biology to clinical translation.Neural regeneration research · 2023Review
- Longitudinal multiparametric MRI of traumatic spinal cord injury in animal models.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2023Review
- Covalent Fragment Inhibits RhoA Activation by Guanine Exchange Factors.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Autologous Genetically Enriched Leucoconcentrate on the Lumbar Spinal Cord Morpho-Functional Recovery in a Mini Pig with Thoracic Spine Contusion Injury.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Current Concepts of Biomaterial Scaffolds and Regenerative Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Title: Immunotherapy; a ground-breaking remedy for spinal cord injury with stumbling blocks: An overview.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with a lifetime of disability stemming from loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions; these losses, along with increased comorbid sequelae, negatively impact health outcomes and quality of life. Early decompression surgery post-SCI can enhance patient outcomes, but does not directly facilitate neural repair and regeneration. Currently, there are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacological therapies to augment motor function and functional recovery in individuals with traumatic SCI. After an SCI, the enzyme, Rho, is activated by growth-inhibitory factors and regulates events that culminate in collapse of the neuronal growth cone, failure of axonal regeneration, and, ultimately, failure of motor and functional recovery. Inhibition of Rho activation is a potential treatment for injuries such as traumatic SCI. VX-210, an investigational agent, inhibits Rho. When administered extradurally after decompression (corpectomy or laminectomy) and stabilization surgery in a phase 1/2a study, VX-210 was well tolerated. Here, we describe the design of the SPRING trial, a multicenter, phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VX-210 (NCT02669849). A subset of patients with acute traumatic cervical SCI is currently being enrolled in the United States and Canada. Medical, neurological, and functional changes are evaluated at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months after VX-210 administration. Efficacy will be assessed by the primary outcome measure, change in upper extremity motor score at 6 months post-treatment, and by secondary outcomes that include question-based and task-based evaluations of functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.