Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316704›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2018

Using Longitudinal Assessment on Extensively Managed Ewes to Quantify Welfare Compromise and Risks.

Carolina Munoz, Angus Campbell, Stuart Barber, Paul Hemsworth, Rebecca Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comprehensive evaluation of dairy ewe welfare in Algerian intensive farms using the BIENE protocol.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2026
    Article
  2. The Effect of Environment and Husbandry Practices on Sheep Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Animal-Based Measures to Assess the Welfare of Extensively Managed Ewes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolina MunozAnimal Welfare Science Centre, The University of Melbourne, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia. cmunoz@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-1417
Angus CampbellFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia. a.campbell@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3907-5048
Stuart BarberFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. srbarber@unimelb.edu.au.
Paul HemsworthAnimal Welfare Science Centre, The University of Melbourne, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia. phh@unimelb.edu.au.
Rebecca DoyleAnimal Welfare Science Centre, The University of Melbourne, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia. rebecca.doyle@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined variation in the welfare of extensively managed ewes and potential welfare risks. A total of 100 Merino ewes (aged 2-4 years) were individually identified and examined at three key stages: pregnancy, lactation and weaning. Eight animal-based welfare measures were used to assess welfare: flight distance, body condition score (BCS), fleece condition, skin lesions, tail length, dag score, lameness and mastitis. Data were analysed by ANOVA and McNemar's statistics. Overall, the average BCS of the group was in agreement with industry recommendations. However, a number of animals were classified with inadequate condition (either too thin or too fat) across the three observation periods. The presence of heavy dags was greatest at mid-lactation (87%,

Indexed as

animal-based indicatorsanimal welfareon-farm welfare assessmentsheep

Identifiers

PMID29316704
PMCPMC5789303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.