Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316699›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Arizona Registered Dietitians Show Gaps in Knowledge of Bean Health Benefits.

Donna M Winham, Andrea M Hutchins, Sharon V Thompson, Mariah K Dougherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donna M WinhamDepartment of Food Science & Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. dwinham@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3924-2560
Andrea M HutchinsDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA. Andrea.Hutchins@uccs.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6806-1158
Sharon V ThompsonDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. svthomps2@illinois.edu.
Mariah K DoughertyDepartment of Pharmaceutical & Nutrition Care, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA. mariahkay21@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Registered Dietitians (RDs) promote nutrition practices and policies and can influence food consumption patterns to include nutrient dense foods such as beans. Although many evidence-based health benefits of bean consumption (e.g., cholesterol reduction, glycemic control) have been demonstrated, there is limited research on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of RDs regarding the inclusion of beans in a healthy diet. To fill this existing research gap, this cross-sectional survey explored the perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes of 296 RDs in Arizona, USA, toward beans. The RDs largely held positive attitudes toward the healthfulness of beans and were aware of many health benefits. Some gaps in awareness were evident, including effect on cancer risk, intestinal health benefits, folate content, and application with celiac disease patients. RDs with greater personal bean consumption had significantly higher bean health benefit knowledge. Twenty-nine percent of the RDs did not know the meaning of 'legume', and over two-thirds could not define the term 'pulse'. It is essential that RDs have up-to-date, evidence-based information regarding bean benefits to provide appropriate education to patients, clients, and the public.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDiet, HealthyFabaceaeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritive ValueAdultArizonaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritionistsPerceptionRecommended Dietary AllowancesSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminology as Topicattitudechronic diseaseconsumptionhealth professionalslegumesnutritionpulses

Identifiers

PMID29316699
PMCPMC5793280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.