Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316607›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2018

Secondary Metabolites of Mangrove-Associated Strains of Talaromyces.

Rosario Nicoletti, Maria Michela Salvatore, Anna Andolfi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Draft genome ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Genomic Analysis ofGenes · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Penicillides fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Diversity of unique, nonmycorrhizal endophytic fungi in cultivatedPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of theMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  14. Extracts ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rosario NicolettiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economy Analysis, 00184 Rome, Italy. rosario.nicoletti@crea.gov.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3049-4641
Maria Michela SalvatoreDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', 80125 Naples, Italy. mariamichela.salvatore@unina.it.
Anna AndolfiDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', 80125 Naples, Italy. andolfi@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boosted by the general aim of exploiting the biotechnological potential of the microbial component of biodiversity, research on the secondary metabolite production of endophytic fungi has remarkably increased in the past few decades. Novel compounds and bioactivities have resulted from this work, which has stimulated a more thorough consideration of various natural ecosystems as conducive contexts for the discovery of new drugs. Thriving at the frontier between land and sea, mangrove forests represent one of the most valuable areas in this respect. The present paper offers a review of the research on the characterization and biological activities of secondary metabolites from manglicolous strains of species belonging to the genus

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological ProductsBiotechnologyDrug DiscoveryEndophytesFungiHumansSecondary MetabolismTalaromycesWetlandsBiological Productsbioactive productsdrug discoveryendophytic fungimangrovesTalaromyces

Identifiers

PMID29316607
PMCPMC5793060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.