Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316372›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Can therapeutic drug monitoring increase the safety of Imatinib in GIST patients?

Wei Zhuang, Jing-Dun Xie, Shan Zhou, Zhi-Wei Zhou, Yi Zhou, Xiao-Wei Sun, Xiu-Hong Yuan, Min Huang, Si Liu, Shuang Xin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Factors Influencing Imatinib-Induced Hepatotoxicity.Cancer research and treatment · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei ZhuangInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Jing-Dun XieState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Shan ZhouInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zhi-Wei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1338-1220
Yi ZhouThe first affiliated hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xiao-Wei SunState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2321-5955
Xiu-Hong YuanState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Min HuangInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Si LiuInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Shuang XinInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Qi-Biao SuCollege of health science, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Hai-Bo QiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Xue-Ding WangInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3580-9155
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangdong Pharmaceutical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imatinib at 400 mg daily is the standard treatment for patients affected with CML and GIST. The intervariability in plasma concentration is very significant. In many reports, a good therapeutic effect is attributed to an adequate concentration of Imatinib. However, few studies have been conducted to investigate the association between plasma concentration and side effects. Besides, no upper concentration limit of Imatinib plasma concentration detection has been established. The correlation of Imatinib trough concentrations (C

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateLeukopeniaMaleMiddle AgedMyelopoiesisPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateAdverse effectsGISTImatinibN-demethyl-Imatinibpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID29316372
PMCPMC5806097
OpenAlexW2783600995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.