ArticleClinical and translational science2018
Developing Pharmacogenomic Reports: Insights from Patients and Clinicians.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient satisfaction with return of pharmacogenomic results utilizing a patient portal message.Pharmacogenomics · 2023Article
- Maturing pharmacogenomic factors deliver improvements and cost efficiencies.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
- Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL).Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Experiences with Pharmacogenomic Testing among Patients and the General Public: Implications for Patient Counseling.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Lay understandings of drug-gene interactions: The right medication, the right dose, at the right time, but what are the right words?Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Preferences for and acceptability of receiving pharmacogenomic results by mail: A focus group study with a primarily African-American cohort.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Patient insights on features of an effective pharmacogenomics patient portal.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2020Article
- Genetic Counseling, Personalized Medicine, and Precision Health.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020Review
- Key Expert Stakeholder Perceptions of the Law of Genomics: Identified Problems and Potential Solutions.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2020Article
- A stepwise approach to implementing pharmacogenetic testing in the primary care setting.Pharmacogenomics · 2019Article
- Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2019Article
- Generation and Implementation of a Patient-Centered and Patient-Facing Genomic Test Report in the EHR.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2018Article
- Implementation of a patient-facing genomic test report in the electronic health record using a web-application interface.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasingly, for a variety of indications, patients have their genomes sequenced and actionable results returned. A subset of returned results is pharmacogenomic (PGx) variants involved in the metabolism or action of medications. Although the impact of these variants on health is well-documented, little research exists on how to communicate these findings to patients and clinicians. We conducted semistructured interviews with end users to understand how best to communicate PGx results. Overall, patients and clinicians had similar opinions regarding report content, delivery, and application. Unique concerns specific to each stakeholder group were also expressed. Patients wanted an easy-to-understand individualized report that clinicians utilized to guide their care. Clinicians wanted reports that were easy-to-use, actionable, and integrated into their workflow. Implementation of these reports in a clinical setting will allow for broader user feedback and iterative improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.