Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316315›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology2018

Scarless wound healing: Transitioning from fetal research to regenerative healing.

Alessandra L Moore, Clement D Marshall, Leandra A Barnes, Matthew P Murphy, Ryan C Ransom, Michael T Longaker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra L MooreDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clement D MarshallDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Leandra A BarnesDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Matthew P MurphyDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Ryan C RansomDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michael T LongakerDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

Fibroblast lineage mechanisms of scarless skin healingR01GM116892 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T, LORENZ, HERMANN PETER · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of scarless fetal skin wound healing, research in the field has expanded significantly with the hopes of advancing the finding to adult human patients. There are several differences between fetal and adult skin that have been exploited to facilitate scarless healing in adults including growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix substitutes. However, no one therapy, pathway, or cell subtype is sufficient to support scarless wound healing in adult skin. More recently, products that contain or mimic fetal and adult uninjured dermis were introduced to the wound healing market with promising clinical outcomes. Through our review of the major experimental targets of fetal wound healing, we hope to encourage research in areas that may have a significant clinical impact. Additionally, we will investigate therapies currently in clinical use and evaluate whether they represent a legitimate advance in regenerative medicine or a vulnerary agent. WIREs Dev Biol 2018, 7:e309. doi: 10.1002/wdev.309 This article is categorized under: Adult Stem Cells, Tissue Renewal, and Regeneration > Regeneration Plant Development > Cell Growth and Differentiation Adult Stem Cells, Tissue Renewal, and Regeneration > Environmental Control of Stem Cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCicatrixHumansSkinStem CellsStem Cell Transplantationfetal wound healingfibrosisregenerative medicinescarlessscarringwound healing

Identifiers

PMID29316315
PMCPMC6485243
OpenAlexW2783749957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.