Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316186›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2018

Organ damage changes in patients with resistant hypertension randomized to renal denervation or spironolactone: The DENERVHTA (Denervación en Hipertensión Arterial) study.

Anna Oliveras, Pedro Armario, Laia Sans, Albert Clarà, Susana Vázquez, Luis Molina, Júlia Pareja, Alejandro de la Sierra, Julio Pascual

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Renal denervation for resistant hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Multi-Organ Denervation: The Past, Present and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Resistant hypertension: a therapeutic challenge.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna OliverasNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5503-545X
Pedro ArmarioInternal Medicine Department, Vascular Risk Area, Hospital Moisés Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Laia SansNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert ClaràIMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
Susana VázquezNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis MolinaIMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
Júlia ParejaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital de l'Esperit Sant, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain.
Alejandro de la SierraInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Julio PascualNephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal denervation and spironolactone have both been proposed for the treatment of resistant hypertension, but their effects on preclinical target organ damage have not been compared. Twenty-four patients with 24-hour systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg despite receiving three or more full-dose antihypertensive drugs, one a diuretic, were randomized to receive spironolactone or renal denervation. Changes in 24-hour blood pressure, urine albumin excretion, arterial stiffness, carotid intima-media thickness, and left ventricular mass index were evaluated at 6 months. Mean baseline-adjusted difference between the two groups (spironolactone vs renal denervation) at 6 months in 24-hour systolic blood pressure was -17.9 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -30.9 to -4.9; P = .01). Mean baseline-adjusted change in urine albumin excretion was -87.2 (95% CI, -164.5 to -9.9) and -23.8 (95% CI, -104.5 to 56.9), respectively (P = .028). Mean baseline-adjusted variation of 24-hour pulse pressure was -13.5 (95% CI, -18.8 to -8.2) and -2.1 (95% CI, -7.9 to 3.7), respectively (P = .006). The correlation of change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure with change in log-transformed urine albumin excretion was r = .713 (P < .001). At 6 months there was a reduction in albuminuria in patients with resistant hypertension treated with spironolactone as compared with renal denervation.

Indexed as

Carotid Intima-Media ThicknessHypertensionRenal EliminationVascular StiffnessAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryDiureticsFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedSpironolactoneSympathectomyAntihypertensive AgentsDiureticsSpironolactonealbuminuriaarterial stiffnesscarotid wall thicknessend organ damageleft ventricular hypertrophyrenal denervationspironolactone

Identifiers

PMID29316186
PMCPMC8031362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.