Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29316089›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2018

An Oxygen-Tolerant PET-RAFT Polymerization for Screening Structure-Activity Relationships.

Adam J Gormley, Jonathan Yeow, Gervase Ng, Órla Conway, Cyrille Boyer, Robert Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam J GormleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2884-725X
Jonathan YeowAustralian Centre for Nanomedicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3709-5149
Gervase NgAustralian Centre for Nanomedicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Órla ConwayAustralian Centre for Nanomedicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Cyrille BoyerAustralian Centre for Nanomedicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4564-4702
Robert ChapmanAustralian Centre for Nanomedicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2333-1473

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Chang S Chan · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity of polymer-protein interactions makes rational design of the best polymer architecture for any given biointerface extremely challenging, and the high throughput synthesis and screening of polymers has emerged as an attractive alternative. A porphyrin-catalysed photoinduced electron/energy transfer-reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (PET-RAFT) polymerisation was adapted to enable high throughput synthesis of complex polymer architectures in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on low-volume well plates in the presence of air. The polymerisation system shows remarkable oxygen tolerance, and excellent control of functional 3- and 4-arm star polymers. We then apply this method to investigate the effect of polymer structure on protein binding, in this case to the lectin concanavalin A (ConA). Such an approach could be applied to screen the structure-activity relationships for any number of polymer-protein interactions.

Indexed as

click chemistryglycopolymersoxygen tolerancePET-RAFTphotomediated radical polymerization

Identifiers

PMID29316089
PMCPMC9641662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.