Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29315443›Full record

ArticleJournal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)2018

Pathophysiology of Corneal Scarring in Persistent Epithelial Defects After PRK and Other Corneal Injuries.

Steven E Wilson, Carla S Medeiros, Marcony R Santhiago

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven E Wilson
Carla S Medeiros
Marcony R Santhiago
Cleveland Clinic · USOphthalmology Associates (United States) · USUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

RESOURCE/SERVICE CORE C - MOLECULAR INFORMATICS MODULEP30EY025585 · NEI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Brian D Perkins · 2016 to 2026
$7.7M
Corneal Epithelial Growth Factors and ReceptorsR01EY010056 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILSON, STEVEN EUGENE · 1994 to 2020
$7.4M
Vision Research Infrastructure Development GrantR24EY015638 · NEI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI HOLLYFIELD, JOE GILBERT · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY025585NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010056NEI NIH HHS R24 EY015638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze corneal persistent epithelial defects that occurred at 3 to 4 weeks after -4.50 diopter (D) photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in rabbits and apply this pathophysiology to the treatment of persistent epithelial defects that occur after any corneal manipulations or diseases.

methodsTwo of 168 corneas that had -4.50 D PRK to study epithelial basement membrane regeneration developed spontaneous persistent epithelial defects that did not heal at 3 weeks after PRK. These were studied with slit-lamp photographs, immunohistochemistry for the myofibroblast marker alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and transmission electron microscopy.

resultsMyofibroblasts developed at the stromal surface within the persistent epithelial defect and for a short distance peripheral to the leading edge of the epithelium. No normal epithelial basement membrane was detectable within the persistent epithelial defect or for up to 0.3 mm behind the leading edge of the epithelium, although epithelial basement membrane had normally regenerated in other areas of the zone ablated by an excimer laser where the epithelium healed promptly.

conclusionsA persistent epithelial defect in the cornea results in the development of myofibroblasts and disordered extracellular matrix produced by these cells that together cause opacity within, and a short distance beyond, the persistent epithelial defect. Clinicians should treat persistent epithelial defects within 10 days of non-closure of the epithelium to facilitate epithelial healing to prevent long-term stromal scarring (fibrosis). [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(1):59-64.].

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsActinsAnimalsCicatrixCorneal DiseasesCorneal InjuriesEpithelium, CornealFemaleImmunohistochemistryLasers, ExcimerMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMyofibroblastsMyopiaPhotorefractive KeratectomyRabbitsActins

Identifiers

PMID29315443
PMCPMC5788463
OpenAlexW2784078255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.