Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29314274›Full record

ArticleProteins2018

Small angle X-ray scattering and cross-linking for data assisted protein structure prediction in CASP 12 with prospects for improved accuracy.

Tadeusz L Ogorzalek, Greg L Hura, Adam Belsom, Kathryn H Burnett, Andriy Kryshtafovych, John A Tainer, Juri Rappsilber, Susan E Tsutakawa, Krzysztof Fidelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Illuminating the "Twilight Zone": Advances in Difficult Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tadeusz L OgorzalekMolecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Greg L HuraMolecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Adam BelsomWellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, U.K.
Kathryn H BurnettMolecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Andriy KryshtafovychProtein Structure Prediction Center, Genome and Biomedical Sciences Facilities, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-7178
John A TainerMolecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Juri RappsilberWellcome Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, U.K.
Susan E TsutakawaMolecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Krzysztof FidelisProtein Structure Prediction Center, Genome and Biomedical Sciences Facilities, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8061-412X

Funding

Transcription-Coupled & Replication-Associated Excision RepairP01CA092584 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI WALTER J. CHAZIN · 2001 to 2026
$89.6M
User Training and OutreachP30GM124169 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI PAUL David ADAMS, Gregory L Hura · 2017 to 2026
$28.6M
Prospective analysis to determine model accuracy performance and boundaries in the post-AlphaFold2 environmentR01GM100482 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIDELIS, KRZYSZTOF A · 2012 to 2025
$11.1M
Integrative modeling of PCNA assemblies engaged in genome duplication and repairR01GM110387 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI IVANOV, IVAYLO NIKOLAEV · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA092584NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM124169NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100482NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental data offers empowering constraints for structure prediction. These constraints can be used to filter equivalently scored models or more powerfully within optimization functions toward prediction. In CASP12, Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) and Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry (CLMS) data, measured on an exemplary set of novel fold targets, were provided to the CASP community of protein structure predictors. As solution-based techniques, SAXS and CLMS can efficiently measure states of the full-length sequence in its native solution conformation and assembly. However, this experimental data did not substantially improve prediction accuracy judged by fits to crystallographic models. One issue, beyond intrinsic limitations of the algorithms, was a disconnect between crystal structures and solution-based measurements. Our analyses show that many targets had substantial percentages of disordered regions (up to 40%) or were multimeric or both. Thus, solution measurements of flexibility and assembly support variations that may confound prediction algorithms trained on crystallographic data and expecting globular fully-folded monomeric proteins. Here, we consider the CLMS and SAXS data collected, the information in these solution measurements, and the challenges in incorporating them into computational prediction. As improvement opportunities were only partly realized in CASP12, we provide guidance on how data from the full-length biological unit and the solution state can better aid prediction of the folded monomer or subunit. We furthermore describe strategic integrations of solution measurements with computational prediction programs with the aim of substantially improving foundational knowledge and the accuracy of computational algorithms for biologically-relevant structure predictions for proteins in solution.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein ConformationScattering, Small AngleAlgorithmsComputational BiologyCross-Linking ReagentsHumansMass SpectrometryProtein FoldingProteinsX-Ray DiffractionCross-Linking ReagentsProteinsassemblycombined methodscrystallographydisorderexperimental restraintsflexibilitymodelingprediction accuracyprotein foldingSASSAXSsolution scatteringsolution structureunfolded regionsunstructured regions

Identifiers

PMID29314274
PMCPMC6003418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.