Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29313019›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2016

Intestinal mucoadhesive devices for oral delivery of insulin.

Amrita Banerjee, JooHee Lee, Samir Mitragotri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Villi Inspired Mechanical Interlocking for Intestinal Retentive Devices.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  4. Transformative Materials for Interfacial Drug Delivery.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Impact of gastric and bowel surgery on gastrointestinal drug delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The strawberry-derived permeation enhancer pelargonidin enables oral protein delivery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Foundations of gastrointestinal-based drug delivery and future developments.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  11. Mucosa-interfacing electronics.Nature reviews. Materials · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review of recently used techniques and materials to improve the efficiency of orally administered proteins/peptides.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Micro and nanoscale technologies in oral drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Orally ingestible medical devices for gut engineering.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amrita BanerjeeDept. of Chemical Engineering University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA 93106.
JooHee LeeDept. of Chemical Engineering University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA 93106.
Samir MitragotriDept. of Chemical Engineering University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA 93106.
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Orally bioactive exenatie and insulin for type II diabetesR01DK097379 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI MITRAGOTRI, SAMIR S · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral delivery of proteins such as insulin has been a long-lasting challenge owing to gastrointestinal degradation and poor permeability of therapeutic macromolecules across biological membranes. We have developed mucoadhesive intestinal devices for oral delivery of insulin to address this challenge. Here we demonstrate a combination of intestinal devices and a permeation enhancer, dimethyl palmitoyl ammonio propanesulfonate (PPS), for oral delivery of insulin. The devices were delivered from a capsule coated with a pH-responsive enteric coating. The devices adhere to intestinal mucosa, release their protein load unidirectionally, and prevent enzymatic degradation in the gut. Devices were found to completely release their drug load within 3-4 hr and showed excellent strength of mucoadhesion to porcine intestine. Devices loaded with insulin and PPS significantly decreased blood glucose levels by 30 and 33% in diabetic and nondiabetic rats, respectively. These studies demonstrate that intestinal mucoadhesive devices are a promising oral alternative to insulin injections and therefore should be further explored for the treatment of diabetes.

Indexed as

diabetesintestinal mucoadhesive patchesoral insulin deliverypermeation enhancers

Identifiers

PMID29313019
PMCPMC5689539
OpenAlexW2422625570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.