ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2016
Engineering of nanoparticle size via electrohydrodynamic jetting.
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lyotropy as a Design Consideration for Ultra-Small Protein Nanoparticles via Electrohydrodynamic Jetting.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Article
- Electrohydrodynamic Jetting of Mucoadhesive Protein Nanoparticles as a Chemopreventive Strategy for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Carboxysome Shell Protein CcmK2 Assembles into Monodisperse and pH-Reversible Microparticles.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Advancing Tumor Therapy: Development and Utilization of Protein-Based Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Review
- A library of Rhodamine6G-based pH-sensitive fluorescent probes with versatileRSC chemical biology · 2022Article
- Protein Nanoparticles: Uniting the Power of Proteins with Engineering Design Approaches.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Systemic brain tumor delivery of synthetic protein nanoparticles for glioblastoma therapy.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Quantitative Particle Uptake by Cells as Analyzed by Different Methods.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020Review
- Electrokinetic characterization of synthetic protein nanoparticles.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2020Article
- Epigallocatechin Gallate-Gold Nanoparticles Exhibit Superior Antitumor Activity Compared to Conventional Gold Nanoparticles: Potential Synergistic Interactions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Compartmentalized Microhelices Prepared via Electrohydrodynamic Cojetting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2018Article
- Introduction to special issue on "Nanoparticles in Medicine: Targeting, Optimization and Clinical Applications".Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineering the physical properties of particles, especially their size, is an important parameter in the fabrication of successful carrier systems for the delivery of therapeutics. Here, various routes were explored for the fabrication of particles in the nanosize regime. It was demonstrated that the use of a charged species and/or solvent with high dielectric constant can influence the size and distribution of particles, with the charged species having a greater effect on the size of the particles and the solvent a greater effect on the distribution of the particles. In addition to the fabrication of nanoparticles, their fractionation into specific size ranges using centrifugation was also investigated. The in vitro particle uptake and intracellular transport of these nanoparticles was studied as a function of size and incubation period. The highest level of intralysosomal localization was observed for the smallest nanoparticle group (average of 174 nm), followed by the groups with increasing sizes (averages of 378 and 575 nm), most likely due to the faster endosomal uptake of smaller particles. In addition, the internalization of nanoparticle clusters and number of nanoparticles per cell increased with longer incubation periods. This work establishes a technological approach to compartmentalized nanoparticles with defined sizes. This is especially important as relatively subtle differences in size can modulate cell uptake and determine intercellular fate. Future work will need to address the role of specific targeting ligands on cellular uptake and intracellular transport of compartmentalized nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.