Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29313007›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2016

Microfluidics-based 3D cell culture models: Utility in novel drug discovery and delivery research.

Nilesh Gupta, Jeffrey R Liu, Brijeshkumar Patel, Deepak E Solomon, Bhuvaneshwar Vaidya, Vivek Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nilesh GuptaNeofluidics LLC, Research and Development Wing San Diego CA 92121.
Jeffrey R LiuNeofluidics LLC, Research and Development Wing San Diego CA 92121.
Brijeshkumar PatelDS Laboratories, Inc., Research and Development Pompano Beach FL 33064.
Deepak E SolomonNeofluidics LLC, Research and Development Wing San Diego CA 92121.
Bhuvaneshwar VaidyaSchool of Pharmacy Keck Graduate Institute Claremont CA 91711.
Vivek GuptaSchool of Pharmacy Keck Graduate Institute Claremont CA 91711.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of microfluidic devices within life sciences has furthered the possibilities of both academic and industrial applications such as rapid genome sequencing, predictive drug studies, and single cell manipulation. In contrast to the preferred two-dimensional cell-based screening, three-dimensional (3D) systems have more in vivo relevance as well as ability to perform as a predictive tool for the success or failure of a drug screening campaign. 3D cell culture has shown an adaptive response to the recent advancements in microfluidic technologies which has allowed better control over spheroid sizes and subsequent drug screening studies. In this review, we highlight the most significant developments in the field of microfluidic 3D culture over the past half-decade with a special focus on their benefits and challenges down the lane. With the newer technologies emerging, implementation of microfluidic 3D culture systems into the drug discovery pipeline is right around the bend.

Indexed as

chipmatrixmicrofluidicsnanoparticlesspheroidthree‐dimensional culture

Identifiers

PMID29313007
PMCPMC5689508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.