Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29312742›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2017

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of lung cancer patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies.

Chuan Li, Wenwen Wu, Nan Chen, Huizi Song, Tianjian Lu, Zhenyu Yang, Zihuai Wang, Jian Zhou, Lunxu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact and prognosis of lung cancer in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiation-Induced Lung Injury (RILI).Frontiers in oncology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE) Clinical Features and Management.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Review
  17. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema with lung cancer: Triple calamity.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chuan LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Wenwen WuWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Nan ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Huizi SongWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Tianjian LuWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhenyu YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zihuai WangWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lunxu LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe characteristic and outcomes of lung cancer patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) have long been assessed, but results were controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the clinical features and prognosis of lung cancer patients with CPFE.

methodsThe databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (updated to October 1, 2017) were searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean differences (WMD) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, the short-term outcome after operation and long-term survival of lung cancer patients with CPFE compared with lung cancer patients without CPFE (fibrosis, emphysema, and normal).

resultsThirty original studies with 8,050 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that lung cancer patients with CPFE were associated with higher age (MD =3.39; 95% CI: 2.12-4.67, P<0.001), male (OR =8.46; 95% CI: 6.36-11.26, P<0.001), ex- or current smoker (OR =39.65; 95% CI: 15.64-100.5, P<0.001), longer smoking history (MD =15.56; 95% CI: 3.73-27.39, P=0.01), lower DLCO% (MD =-13.82; 95% CI: -21.4 to -6.24, P<0.001), squamous cell carcinoma histology (OR =3.55; 95% CI: 2.49-5.05, P<0.001), the lower lobes (OR =1.92; 95% CI: 1.52-2.43, P<0.001), advanced pathological stage (OR =1.55; 95% CI: 1.22-1.96, P<0.001). Lung cancer patients with CPFE had higher 30-day mortality (OR =4.72, 95% CI: 2.06-10.85, P<0.001), 90-day mortality (OR =5.33; 95% CI: 1.39-20.42, P=0.01), and incidence of postoperative complications (OR =5.25, 95% CI: 2.38-11.57, P<0.001). In addition, the lung cancer patients with CPFE had a poorer OS (HR =2.006, 95% CI: 1.347-2.986, P=0.001) than lung cancer patients without CPFE.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrated that lung cancer patients with CPFE have more aggressive clinical characteristic and a poor prognosis, suggesting that lung cancer patients with CPFE should be early detected, treated reasonably and be taken good care of.

Indexed as

combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE)Lung cancerprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29312742
PMCPMC5756974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.