Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29312391›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Ten Years of Landscape Genomics: Challenges and Opportunities.

Yong Li, Xue-Xia Zhang, Run-Li Mao, Jie Yang, Cai-Yun Miao, Zhuo Li, Ying-Xiong Qiu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Insights into the Origin, High Fecundity and Environmental Adaptation of Hu Sheep.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic structure and local adaptation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yong LiCollege of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xue-Xia ZhangCollege of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Run-Li MaoCollege of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jie YangCollege of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Cai-Yun MiaoCollege of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhuo LiCollege of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ying-Xiong QiuKey Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered Wildlife of the Ministry of Education and Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany and Biodiversity, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landscape genomics is a relatively new discipline that aims to reveal the relationship between adaptive genetic imprints in genomes and environmental heterogeneity among natural populations. Although the interest in landscape genomics has increased since this term was coined, studies on this topic remain scarce. Landscape genomics has become a powerful method to scan and determine the genes responsible for the complex adaptive evolution of species at population (mostly) and individual (more rarely) level. This review outlines the sampling strategies, molecular marker types and research categories in 37 articles published during the first 10 years of this field (i.e., 2007-2016). We also address major challenges and future directions for landscape genomics. This review aims to promote interest in conducting additional studies in landscape genomics.

Indexed as

adaptive evolutiongenetic structurelandscape genomicsmolecular ecologypopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID29312391
PMCPMC5733015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.