Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29312282›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2017

Development of Endotoxin Tolerance Does Not Influence the Response to a Challenge with the Mucosal Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Humans

Rebecca M Koch, Matthijs Kox, Eleonora J M Thijs, Janette C Rahamat-Langendoen, Frank L van de Veerdonk, Jelle Gerretsen, Joyce Schloesser, Dimitri Diavatopoulos, Guus F Rimmelzwaan, Mihai G Netea and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effect of combined infection withOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Septic acute kidney injury: a review of basic research.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rebecca M KochDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Matthijs KoxDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Eleonora J M ThijsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Janette C Rahamat-LangendoenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Frank L van de VeerdonkRadboud Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jelle GerretsenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Joyce SchloesserNIZO Food Research BV, Ede, Netherlands.
Dimitri DiavatopoulosLaboratory of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Guus F RimmelzwaanDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mihai G NeteaRadboud Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Johannes G van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Marien I de JongeRadboud Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe effects of bacterial infections on the response to subsequent viral infections are largely unknown. This is important to elucidate to increase insight into the pathophysiology of bacterial and viral co-infections, and to assess whether bacterial infections may influence the course of viral infections.

methodsHealthy male subjects received either bacterial endotoxin [

resultsLPS administration resulted in increased plasma cytokine levels and development of endotoxin tolerance

conclusionWhile endotoxemia profoundly attenuates the immune response upon a second LPS challenge, it does not influence the Fluenz-induced immune response. These results suggest immune suppression after bacterial infection does not alter the response to a subsequent viral infection.

Indexed as

endotoxin toleranceFluenzinfluenzalipopolysaccharidelive-attenuated quadrivalent influenza vaccinesepsistwo-hit model

Identifiers

PMID29312282
PMCPMC5732479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.