Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29312186›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

High Prevalence of CTX-M-15-Type ESBL-Producing

Mashkoor Mohsin, Shahbaz Raza, Katharina Schaufler, Nicole Roschanski, Fatima Sarwar, Torsten Semmler, Peter Schierack, Sebastian Guenther

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surveillance of CTX-M group 1-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Environmental Dispersion of MultiresistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. One health clones of multidrug-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mashkoor MohsinInstitute of Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shahbaz RazaInstitute of Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Katharina SchauflerInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nicole RoschanskiInstitute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Fatima SarwarInstitute of Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Torsten SemmlerNG 1-Microbial Genomics, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Peter SchierackFaculty of Environment and Natural Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
Sebastian GuentherInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased presence of clinically relevant multidrug resistant bacteria in natural environments is an emerging challenge for global health care. Little is known regarding the occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceESBL-producing E. coligenomic epidemiologyPakistanwild birds

Identifiers

PMID29312186
PMCPMC5733096
OpenAlexW2771077517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.