Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29312184›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017

Julian Quehenberger, Lu Shen, Sonja-Verena Albers, Bettina Siebers, Oliver Spadiut

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mixed Strain Fermentation and Metabonomics for Solving Issues of Bioproduction.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Teaching old dogs new tricks: genetic engineering methanogens.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Extremophiles in a changing world.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Gear Shifting in Biological Energy Transduction.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. kFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julian QuehenbergerResearch Division Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Technical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Lu ShenDepartment of Molecular Enzyme Technology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry - Biofilm Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sonja-Verena AlbersMolecular Biology of Archaea, Institute of Biology II-Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Bettina SiebersDepartment of Molecular Enzyme Technology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry - Biofilm Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Oliver SpadiutResearch Division Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Technical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extremophilic organisms represent a potentially valuable resource for the development of novel bioprocesses. They can act as a source for stable enzymes and unique biomaterials. Extremophiles are capable of carrying out microbial processes and biotransformations under extremely hostile conditions. Extreme thermoacidophilic members of the well-characterized genus

Indexed as

acidophilebioprocessingbiorefinerybiotechnologySulfolobusthermophile

Identifiers

PMID29312184
PMCPMC5733018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.