Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311997›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

Superior Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate Continuous Training on Arterial Stiffness in Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Henner Hanssen, Alice Minghetti, Stefano Magon, Anja Rossmeissl, Athina Papadopoulou, Christopher Klenk, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, Oliver Faude, Lukas Zahner, Till Sprenger and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Physical exercise and migraine: for or against?Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Henner HanssenDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Alice MinghettiDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefano MagonDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Anja RossmeisslDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Athina PapadopoulouDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christopher KlenkDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Arno Schmidt-TrucksässDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Oliver FaudeDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas ZahnerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Till SprengerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lars DonathDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

arterial stiffnesscardiovascular riskexercisehigh intensity interval trainingmigrainerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID29311997
PMCPMC5742195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.