Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311853›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2017

Sampling the Mouse Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus.

Lisa Basler, Stephan Gerdes, David P Wolfer, Lutz Slomianka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Whole-BodyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa BaslerDivision of Functional Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stephan GerdesDivision of Functional Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
David P WolferDivision of Functional Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Lutz SlomiankaDivision of Functional Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sampling is a critical step in procedures that generate quantitative morphological data in the neurosciences. Samples need to be representative to allow statistical evaluations, and samples need to deliver a precision that makes statistical evaluations not only possible but also meaningful. Sampling generated variability should, e.g., not be able to hide significant group differences from statistical detection if they are present. Estimators of the coefficient of error (

Indexed as

C57BL/6 miceCavalieri estimatorCE estimatorsdentate gyrusstereologyvolume

Identifiers

PMID29311853
PMCPMC5733054
OpenAlexW2771574848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.