Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311323›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Suppression of frontal eye field neuronal responses with maintained fixation.

Koorosh Mirpour, Zeinab Bolandnazar, James W Bisley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Responses to Visual Speech in Human Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Examined with iEEG Deconvolution.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The neural instantiation of a priority map.Current opinion in psychology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurons in FEF Keep Track of Items That Have Been Previously Fixated in Free Viewing Visual Search.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Koorosh MirpourDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095; kmirpour@mednet.ucla.edu.
Zeinab BolandnazarDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
James W BisleyDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Funding

The Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Guidance of Visual AttentionR01EY019273 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BISLEY, JAMES · 2008 to 2017
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decision of where to make an eye movement is thought to be driven primarily by responses to stimuli in neurons' receptive fields (RFs) in oculomotor areas, including the frontal eye field (FEF) of prefrontal cortex. It is also thought that a saccade may be generated when the accumulation of this activity in favor of one location or another reaches a threshold. However, in the reading and scene perception fields, it is well known that the properties of the stimulus at the fovea often affect when the eyes leave that stimulus. We propose that if FEF plays a role in generating eye movements, then the identity of the stimulus at fixation should affect the FEF responses so as to reduce the probability of making a saccade when fixating an item of interest. Using a visual foraging task in which animals could make multiple eye movements within a single trial, we found that responses were strongly modulated by the identity of the stimulus at the fovea. Specifically, responses to the stimulus in the RF were suppressed when the animal maintained fixation for longer durations on a stimulus that could be associated with a reward. We suggest that this suppression, which was predicted by models of eye movement behavior, could be a mechanism by which FEF can modulate the temporal flow of saccades based on the importance of the stimulus at the fovea.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularSaccadesAnimalsFrontal LobeMacaca mulattaeye movementsfrontal eye fieldoculomotorsearch

Identifiers

PMID29311323
PMCPMC5789937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.