Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311305›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Chemical encoding of risk perception and predator detection among estuarine invertebrates.

Remington X Poulin, Serge Lavoie, Katherine Siegel, David A Gaul, Marc J Weissburg, Julia Kubanek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolomics on the study of marine organisms.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Remington X PoulinSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Serge LavoieAquatic Chemical Ecology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Katherine SiegelSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
David A GaulSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Marc J WeissburgAquatic Chemical Ecology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Julia KubanekSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332; julia.kubanek@biosci.gatech.edu.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective strategy for prey to survive in habitats rich in predators is to avoid being noticed. Thus, prey are under selection pressure to recognize predators and adjust their behavior, which can impact numerous community-wide interactions. Many animals in murky and turbulent aquatic environments rely on waterborne chemical cues. Previous research showed that the mud crab,

Indexed as

AnimalsAquatic OrganismsBrachyuraCuesEcologyEcosystemFearFeeding BehaviorMarine BiologyMetabolomicsPredatory BehaviorRisk Reduction BehaviorUrineblue crabchemical ecologymetabolomicsnonconsumptive effectspredation

Identifiers

PMID29311305
PMCPMC5789921
OpenAlexW2771448378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.