Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311238›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2018

Bacterial Pathogen Emergence Requires More than Direct Contact with a Novel Passerine Host.

Molly Staley, Geoffrey E Hill, Chloe C Josefson, Jonathan W Armbruster, Camille Bonneaud

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding the emergence of bacterial pathogens in novel hosts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Contrasting evolution of virulence and replication rate in an emerging bacterial pathogen.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Veterinary sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Molly StaleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA Molly.Staley@czs.org C.Bonneaud@exeter.ac.uk.
Geoffrey E HillDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Chloe C JosefsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Jonathan W ArmbrusterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Camille BonneaudBiosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Cornwall, United Kingdom Molly.Staley@czs.org C.Bonneaud@exeter.ac.uk.
American Museum of Natural History · USAuburn University · USUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While direct contact may sometimes be sufficient to allow a pathogen to jump into a new host species, in other cases, fortuitously adaptive mutations that arise in the original donor host are also necessary. Viruses have been the focus of most host shift studies, so less is known about the importance of ecological versus evolutionary processes to successful bacterial host shifts. Here we tested whether direct contact with the novel host was sufficient to enable the mid-1990s jump of the bacterium

Indexed as

FinchesAnimalsBacterial LoadBird DiseasesGenome, BacterialHost SpecificityMaleMycoplasma gallisepticumMycoplasma Infectionsdisease emergencehost shiftMycoplasma gallisepticum

Identifiers

PMID29311238
PMCPMC5820954
OpenAlexW2783455145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.