Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311140›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Visual Short-Term Memory Activity in Parietal Lobe Reflects Cognitive Processes beyond Attentional Selection.

Summer L Sheremata, David C Somers, Sarah Shomstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontoparietal Network Connectivity During anFrontiers in psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Summer L SheremataDepartment of Psychology, ssheremata@fau.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2676-9347
David C SomersDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, and.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-5895
Sarah ShomsteinDepartment of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.

Funding

Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
Human Fronto-Parietal Networks for Visual Attention and MemoryR01EY022229 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SOMERS, DAVID C · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Cortical responses, and their modification, with limited attentional contributionR21EY021644 · NEI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHOMSTEIN, SARAH SVETLANA · 2011 to 2012
$435k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022229NEI NIH HHS R21 EY021644NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) and attention are distinct yet interrelated processes. While both require selection of information across the visual field, memory additionally requires the maintenance of information across time and distraction. VSTM recruits areas within human (male and female) dorsal and ventral parietal cortex that are also implicated in spatial selection; therefore, it is important to determine whether overlapping activation might reflect shared attentional demands. Here, identical stimuli and controlled sustained attention across both tasks were used to ask whether fMRI signal amplitude, functional connectivity, and contralateral visual field bias reflect memory-specific task demands. While attention and VSTM activated similar cortical areas, BOLD amplitude and functional connectivity in parietal cortex differentiated the two tasks. Relative to attention, VSTM increased BOLD amplitude in dorsal parietal cortex and decreased BOLD amplitude in the angular gyrus. Additionally, the tasks differentially modulated parietal functional connectivity. Contrasting VSTM and attention, intraparietal sulcus (IPS) 1-2 were more strongly connected with anterior frontoparietal areas and more weakly connected with posterior regions. This divergence between tasks demonstrates that parietal activation reflects memory-specific functions and consequently modulates functional connectivity across the cortex. In contrast, both tasks demonstrated hemispheric asymmetries for spatial processing, exhibiting a stronger contralateral visual field bias in the left versus the right hemisphere across tasks, suggesting that asymmetries are characteristic of a shared selection process in IPS. These results demonstrate that parietal activity and patterns of functional connectivity distinguish VSTM from more general attention processes, establishing a central role of the parietal cortex in maintaining visual information.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionCognitionEye MovementsFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermNeural PathwaysParietal LobePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceVisual FieldsVisual Perceptionattentionparietalvisual short-term memory

Identifiers

PMID29311140
PMCPMC5815351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.