Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311084›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Relebactam, a Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor, Dosed in Combination with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Healthy Subjects.

Matthew L Rizk, Elizabeth G Rhee, Patricia A Jumes, Mark H Gotfried, Tian Zhao, Eric Mangin, Sheng Bi, Cynthia M Chavez-Eng, Zufei Zhang, Joan R Butterton

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Towards a holistic approach to pulmonary infections. Insights from the Sixth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2024.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  12. Novel Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Nosocomial Pneumonia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CarbapenemsHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew L RizkMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA matthew.rizk@merck.com.
Elizabeth G RheeMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Patricia A JumesMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Mark H GotfriedPulmonary Associates, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Tian ZhaoMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Eric ManginMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Sheng BiMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Cynthia M Chavez-EngMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Zufei ZhangMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Joan R ButtertonMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USPulmonary Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase I study assessed the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profiles of relebactam (MK-7655), a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, and imipenem. Sixteen healthy subjects received 250 mg relebactam with 500 mg imipenem-cilastatin, given intravenously every 6 h for 5 doses, and were randomized to bronchoscopy/bronchoalveolar lavage at 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 3 h after the last dose (4 subjects per time point). Both drugs penetrated the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) to a similar degree, with the profiles being similar in shape to the corresponding plasma profiles and with the apparent terminal half-lives in plasma and ELF being 1.2 and 1.3 h, respectively, for relebactam and 1.0 h in both compartments for imipenem. The exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) in ELF relative to that in plasma was 54% for relebactam and 55% for imipenem, after adjusting for protein binding. ELF penetration for relebactam was further analyzed by fitting the data to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model to capture its behavior in plasma, with a partitioning coefficient capturing its behavior in the lung compartment. In this model, the time-invariant partition coefficient for relebactam was found to be 55%, based on free drug levels. These results support the clinical evaluation of relebactam with imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial pneumonia.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsCilastatinCilastatin, Imipenem Drug CombinationFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImipenemLungMaleYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsCilastatinCilastatin, Imipenem Drug CombinationImipenemrelebactamhealthy subjectsimipenemintrapulmonary pharmacokineticsrelebactam

Identifiers

PMID29311084
PMCPMC5826112
OpenAlexW2783246132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.