Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29311051›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Relationship Between State-Level Google Online Search Volume and Cancer Incidence in the United States: Retrospective Study.

Charles A Phillips, Allison Barz Leahy, Yimei Li, Marilyn M Schapira, L Charles Bailey, Raina M Merchant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles A PhillipsDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-1673
Allison Barz LeahyDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-4064
Yimei LiDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-6992
Marilyn M SchapiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3775-9462
L Charles BaileyDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-0662
Raina M MerchantPenn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9801-6881

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Pediatric Hospital Epidemiology and Outcomes Research Training ProgramT32HD060550 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Christopher Peter Bonafide, John Chris Feudtner · 2010 to 2026
$6.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD060550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, cancer is common, with high morbidity and mortality; cancer incidence varies between states. Online searches reflect public awareness, which could be driven by the underlying regional cancer epidemiology.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to characterize the relationship between cancer incidence and online Google search volumes in the United States for 6 common cancers. A secondary objective was to evaluate the association of search activity with cancer-related public events and celebrity news coverage.

methodsWe performed a population-based, retrospective study of state-level cancer incidence from 2004 through 2013 reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for breast, prostate, colon, lung, and uterine cancers and leukemia compared to Google Trends (GT) relative search volume (RSV), a metric designed by Google to allow interest in search topics to be compared between regions. Participants included persons in the United States who searched for cancer terms on Google. The primary measures were the correlation between annual state-level cancer incidence and RSV as determined by Spearman correlation and linear regression with RSV and year as independent variables and cancer incidence as the dependent variable. Temporal associations between search activity and events raising public awareness such as cancer awareness months and cancer-related celebrity news were described.

resultsAt the state level, RSV was significantly correlated to incidence for breast (r=.18, P=.001), prostate (r=-.27, P<.001), lung (r=.33, P<.001), and uterine cancers (r=.39, P<.001) and leukemia (r=.13, P=.003) but not colon cancer (r=-.02, P=.66). After adjusting for time, state-level RSV was positively correlated to cancer incidence for all cancers: breast (P<.001, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.19), prostate (P=.38, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.22), lung (P<.001, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.46), colon (P<.001, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.17), and uterine cancers (P<.001, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.12) and leukemia (P<.001, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.03). Temporal associations in GT were noted with breast cancer awareness month but not with other cancer awareness months and celebrity events.

conclusionsCancer incidence is correlated with online search volume at the state level. Search patterns were temporally associated with cancer awareness months and celebrity announcements. Online searches reflect public awareness. Advancing understanding of online search patterns could augment traditional epidemiologic surveillance, provide opportunities for targeted patient engagement, and allow public information campaigns to be evaluated in ways previously unable to be measured.

Indexed as

AwarenessHumansIncidenceInternetNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSearch EngineUnited StatescancerGoogleincidenceinfodemiologyInternet

Identifiers

PMID29311051
PMCPMC5778251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.