Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29310815›Full record

ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2018

Endoluminal stenting for the management of leak following sleeve gastrectomy and loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy.

Ying-Nan Tsai, Hsiu-Po Wang, Chih-Kun Huang, Po-Chin Chang, I-Chang Lin, Chi-Ming Tai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Endoscopic luminal stenting: Current applications and future perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ying-Nan TsaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsiu-Po WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chih-Kun HuangBody Science and Metabolic Disorders International (BMI) Medical Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Po-Chin ChangWeight Management Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
I-Chang LinDepartment of Radiology, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Chi-Ming TaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC. Electronic address: chimingtai@gmail.com.
E-Da Hospital · TWChina Medical University · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative leak is a serious complication of bariatric surgery and often results in significant morbidity and mortality. Stent placement is a less invasive alternative to surgery for the treatment of bariatric surgical leak. We evaluated the efficacy and complications of covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in the treatment of post-bariatric surgical leak. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent stent placement for leak after bariatric surgery. Leak was diagnosed by upper gastrointestinal series or was visualized during the endoscopy. We examined the timing of stent placement, size of the leak, stent migration and its complications, total stent treatment duration, and treatment outcome. Between January 2011 and April 2015, seven patients underwent covered SEMS placement for leak after bariatric surgery, including laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) (n = 5) and laparoscopic loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (LDJB-SG) (n = 2). A stent was placed in one patient for infection control and bridging to revisional surgery. Among the other six patients, one patient who received stent placement one year after leak diagnosis failed to achieve leak closure, and five patients with early stent placement achieved leak closure. Three patients with small leak achieved leak closure more quickly. Stent migration was found in six patients, and associated ulcers occurred in five patients. We conclude that stenting is effective in the management of staple-line leaks following LSG and LDJB-SG. Stent migration and associated ulcers are common after stent placement. Early stent removal can be achieved in patients with small leaks.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakBariatric SurgeryDuodenumEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleGastrectomyHumansJejunumMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidRetrospective StudiesStentsSurgical StaplingBariatric surgeryEndoluminal stentingLeakMetal stentsSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID29310815
PMCPMC11915569
OpenAlexW2752779294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.