ArticleTrials2018
Commentary: considerations for using the 'Trials within Cohorts' design in a clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product.
Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges-a systematic review.Trials · 2024Pooled it
- Platform trials-an emerging methodology for perioperative medicine: a narrative review.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Immunotherapy in Urothelial Cancer: Stop When Achieving a Response, Restart upon Disease Progression.Cancers · 2023Article
- The Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) study design in oncology: experience and methodological reflections.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) - a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Article
- Protocol for an open label: phase I trial within a cohort of foetal cell transplants in people with Huntington's disease.Brain communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 'trials within cohorts' (TwiC) design is a pragmatic approach to randomised trials in which trial participants are randomly selected from an existing cohort. The design has multiple potential benefits, including the option of conducting multiple trials within the same cohort. MAIN TEXT: To date, the TwiC design methodology been used in numerous clinical settings but has never been applied to a clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product (CTIMP). We have recently secured the necessary approvals to undertake the first CTIMP using the TwiC design. In this paper, we describe some of the considerations and modifications required to ensure such a trial is compliant with Good Clinical Practice and international clinical trials regulations. We advocate using a two-stage consent process and using the consent stages to explicitly differentiate between trial participants and cohort participants who are providing control data. This distinction ensured compliance but had consequences with respect to costings, recruitment and the trial assessment schedule.
conclusionWe have demonstrated that it is possible to secure ethical and regulatory approval for a CTIMP TwiC. By including certain considerations at the trial design stage, we believe this pragmatic and efficient methodology could be utilised in other CTIMPs in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.