Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29310692›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2018

Epigenetic supersimilarity of monozygotic twin pairs.

Timothy E Van Baak, Cristian Coarfa, Pierre-Antoine Dugué, Giovanni Fiorito, Eleonora Laritsky, Maria S Baker, Noah J Kessler, Jianrong Dong, Jack D Duryea, Matt J Silver and 14 more

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. New insights into the (epi)genetics of twinning.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. MidbrainbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Non-coding 886 (Epigenetics · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Timothy E Van BaakUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Cristian CoarfaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Pierre-Antoine DuguéCancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Giovanni FioritoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Torino and Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, Torino, Italy.
Eleonora LaritskyUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Maria S BakerUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Noah J KesslerMRC Unit The Gambia, Keneba, Gambia.
Jianrong DongDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jack D DuryeaUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Matt J SilverMRC Unit The Gambia, Keneba, Gambia.
Ayden SaffariMRC Unit The Gambia, Keneba, Gambia.
Andrew M PrenticeMRC Unit The Gambia, Keneba, Gambia.
Sophie E MooreMRC Unit The Gambia, Keneba, Gambia.
Akram GhantousEpigenetics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Michael N RoutledgeLICAMM, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Yun Yun GongSchool of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Zdenko HercegEpigenetics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Paolo VineisMRC-PHE Center for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gianluca SeveriCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School for Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John L HopperCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School for Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Melissa C SoutheyGenetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Graham G GilesCancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Roger L MilneCancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Robert A WaterlandUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. waterland@bcm.edu.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC-A760-5QX00Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/M01424X/1Medical Research Council MC_U123292700Medical Research Council MC_U123292701Medical Research Council MC_UU_00026/3Medical Research Council MR/M01424X/1Medical Research Council MR/P012019/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonozygotic twins have long been studied to estimate heritability and explore epigenetic influences on phenotypic variation. The phenotypic and epigenetic similarities of monozygotic twins have been assumed to be largely due to their genetic identity.

resultsHere, by analyzing data from a genome-scale study of DNA methylation in monozygotic and dizygotic twins, we identified genomic regions at which the epigenetic similarity of monozygotic twins is substantially greater than can be explained by their genetic identity. This "epigenetic supersimilarity" apparently results from locus-specific establishment of epigenotype prior to embryo cleavage during twinning. Epigenetically supersimilar loci exhibit systemic interindividual epigenetic variation and plasticity to periconceptional environment and are enriched in sub-telomeric regions. In case-control studies nested in a prospective cohort, blood DNA methylation at these loci years before diagnosis is associated with risk of developing several types of cancer.

conclusionsThese results establish a link between early embryonic epigenetic development and adult disease. More broadly, epigenetic supersimilarity is a previously unrecognized phenomenon that may contribute to the phenotypic similarity of monozygotic twins.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticCpG IslandsDNADNA MethylationGenome, HumanHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasmsTwins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticDNACancerDevelopmental programmingDizygoticDOHaDEpigeneticsMetastable epiallelesMonozygoticTwins

Identifiers

PMID29310692
PMCPMC5759268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.