ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2018
Failure to shorten the diagnostic delay in two ultra-orphan diseases (mucopolysaccharidosis types I and III): potential causes and implications.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of the diagnostic odyssey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Delayed diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I in a patient with spinopelvic instability, short stature, and skeletal dysplasia.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Unveiling Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIC in Brazil: Diagnostic Journey and Clinical Features of Brazilian Patients Identified Through the MPS Brazil Network.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Economic burden of Sanfilippo syndrome in the United States.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Mapping the diagnostic odyssey of congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG): insights from the community.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Health service utilization, economic burden and quality of life of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis in China.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Navigating the Unique Challenges of Caregiving for Children with Rare Diseases: Are the Care Experiences of All Caregivers the Same? A Focus on Life-Limiting Rare Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Light and Shadows in Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Eight Years of Experience in Northeast Italy.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Phenotypic presentation of Mendelian disease across the diagnostic trajectory in electronic health records.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Enhancing Equitable Access to Rare Disease Diagnosis and Treatment around the World: A Review of Evidence, Policies, and Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Diagnostic delay in rare diseases: data from the Spanish rare diseases patient registry.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Sanfilippo syndrome: consensus guidelines for clinical care.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Review
- MPSI Manifestations and Treatment Outcome: Skeletal Focus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Twenty years of Colombian experience with enzymatic screening in patients with features of mucopolysaccharidosis.JIMD reports · 2022Article
- Quantification of Idua Enzymatic Activity Combined with Observation of Phenotypic Change in Zebrafish Embryos Provide a Preliminary Assessment of MutatedJournal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Natural History and Molecular Characteristics of Korean Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type III.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Is it possible to implement a rare disease case-finding tool in primary care? A UK-based pilot study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Review
- The Diagnostic Journey of Childhood Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: Perspectives of Children and Their Caregivers.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- Opportunities and challenges for newborn screening and early diagnosis of rare diseases in Latin America.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Diagnosis is in the Eye of the Beholder: Barriers to Early Diagnosis of Mucopolysaccharidosis in Children in India.Journal of pediatric genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRare diseases are often un- or misdiagnosed for extended periods, resulting in a long diagnostic delay that may significantly add to the burden of the disease. An early diagnosis is particularly essential if a disease-modifying treatment is available. The purpose of this study was to assess the extent of the diagnostic delay in the two ultra-rare diseases, i.e., mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I) and III (MPS III), both of which are lysosomal storage disorders with different phenotypic severities (MPS 1 is characterized by the severe Hurler and the more attenuated non-Hurler phenotypes, MPS III is characterized by the severe rapidly progressing (RP) phenotype and more attenuated slowly progressing (SP) phenotype). We investigated whether the diagnostic delay changed over the previous decades.
resultsThe diagnostic delay, which is defined as the time between the first visit to a medical doctor for disease-related symptoms and the final diagnosis, was assessed using telephone interviews with patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2017 and/or their parents or legal guardian(s). In addition, the medical charts were reviewed. For MPS I (n = 29), the median diagnostic delay was 8 months (range 1-24 months) for Hurler patients and 28 months (range 2-147 months) for non-Hurler patients. For MPS III (n = 46), the median diagnostic delay was 33 months (range 1-365 months). No difference was observed between the RP and SP phenotypic groups. Comparing the diagnostic delay over time using 5-year time intervals, no reduction in the diagnostic delay was observed for MPS I or MPS III.
conclusionsIn the Netherlands, the time to diagnosis for patients with MPS I and MPS III has not changed between 1988 and 2017, and an extensive delay still exists between the first visit to a medical doctor for disease-related symptoms and the final diagnosis. The numerous campaigns launched to increase awareness, leading to earlier diagnosis of these rare disorders, particularly of MPS I, have failed to achieve their goal. Robust selected screening protocols embedded in national guidelines and newborn screening for disorders that meet the criteria for population screening may be the only effective approaches for reducing the diagnostic delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.