Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29310605›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2018

A randomized controlled trial of a skills training for oncologists and a communication aid for patients to stimulate shared decision making about palliative systemic treatment (CHOICE): study protocol.

I Henselmans, E M A Smets, J C J M de Haes, M G W Dijkgraaf, F Y de Vos, H W M van Laarhoven

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05931978 (The Effect of a Consultation Dashboard on Patient Activation and Shared Decision Making), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05931978 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Consultation Dashboard on Patient Activation and Shared Decision Making

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Antonius HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B, Chronic Kidney Disease stage4ArmsCKD dashboard
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Potential Adverse Outcomes of Shared Decision Making about Palliative Cancer Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Oncologists' communication about tobacco and alcohol use during treatment for esophagogastric cancer: a qualitative observational study of simulated consultations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Status quo of advanced cancer patients participating in shared decision-making in China: a mixed study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I HenselmansDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. I.Henselmans@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-7495
E M A SmetsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J C J M de HaesDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M G W DijkgraafClinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
F Y de VosDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding (NL) UVA 2013-5949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes little benefit while the burden can be high. Hence, treatment decisions require Shared Decision Making (SDM). The CHOICE trial examines the separate and combined effect of oncologist training and a patient communication aid on SDM in consultations about palliative systemic treatment.

methodsA RCT design with four parallel arms will be adopted. Patients with metastatic or irresectable cancer with a median life expectancy <12 months who meet with a medical oncologist to discuss the start or continuation of palliative systemic treatment are eligible. A total of 24 oncologists (in training) and 192 patients will be recruited. The oncologist training consists of a reader, two group sessions (3.5 h; including modelling videos and role play), a booster feedback session (1 h) and a consultation room tool. The patient communication aid consists of a home-sent question prompt list and a value clarification exercise to prepare patients for SDM in the consultation. The control condition consists of care as usual. The primary outcome is observed SDM in audio-recorded consultations. Secondary outcomes include patient and oncologist evaluation of communication and decision-making, the decision made, quality of life, potential adverse outcomes such as anxiety and hopelessness, and consultation duration. Patients fill out questionnaires at baseline (T0), before (T1) and after the consultation (T2) and at 3 and 6 months (T3 and T4). All oncologists participate in two standardized patient assessments (before-after training) prior to the start of patient inclusion. They will fill out a questionnaire before and after these assessments, as well as after each of the recorded consultations in clinical practice. DISCUSSION: The CHOICE trial will enable evidence-based choices regarding the investment in SDM interventions targeting either oncologists, patients or both in the advanced cancer setting. The trial takes into account the immediate effect of the interventions on observed communication, but also on more distal and potential adverse patient outcomes. Also, the trial provides evidence regarding the assumption that SDM about palliative cancer treatment results in less aggressive treatment and more quality of life in the final period of life.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Registry number NTR5489 (prospective; 15 Sep 2015).

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsOncologistsPalliative CarePatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvanced cancerDoctor-patient communicationPalliative medicinePatient educationPatient participationShared decision makingSkills trainingSystemic treatment

Identifiers

PMID29310605
PMCPMC5759304
OpenAlexW2783642918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.