Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29310569›Full record

Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2018

The antibiotic checklist: an observational study of the discrepancy between reported and actually performed checklist items.

Frederike V van Daalen, Marlies E J L Hulscher, Cas Minderhoud, Jan M Prins, Suzanne E Geerlings

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frederike V van DaalenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Room F4-132, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. f.v.vandaalen@amc.nl.
Marlies E J L HulscherRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Cas MinderhoudDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Room F4-132, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan M PrinsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Room F4-132, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Suzanne E GeerlingsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Room F4-132, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 836021001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChecklists are increasingly used to measure quality of care. Recently we implemented an antibiotic checklist in nine Dutch hospitals and showed that use of the checklist resulted in more appropriate antibiotic use. While more appropriate antibiotic use was associated with a reduction in length of stay, use of the checklist in itself was not. In the current study we explored discrepancies between reported and actually performed checklist items at the patient level to test the validity of checklist answers, to evaluate whether discrepancies between reported and actually performed checklist items could explain the lack of effect of checklist use on length of stay, and to identify missed opportunities for performance per checklist item.

methodsChecklist answers represented reported performance. Actual performance was assessed by data from the patients' medical files. Reported and actually performed checklist items could be 'both YES'; 'both NO'; 'YES reported, NOT actually performed'; or 'NO reported, YES actually performed'. We determined an overall 'both YES' score per checklist, and used mixed models to evaluate whether an association existed between this overall score and patient's length of hospital stay. Finally, we analysed whether the items that were not actually performed, could have been performed.

resultsBetween January and October 2015 physicians filled in 1207 checklists. In total 7881 items were checked. Most items were 'both YES' (3392/7881, 43.0%) or 'both NO' (2601/7881, 33.0%). The number of 'YES reported, NOT actually performed' items was 1628/7881 (20.7%) compared to 260/7881 (3.3%) 'NO reported, YES actually performed' items. The level of discrepancy between reported and actually performed items differed per checklist item. The item 'prescribe antibiotic treatment according to the local guideline' had the highest percentage of 'YES reported, NOT actually performed' items, namely 45.1%. A higher overall 'both YES' score of the checklist was significantly associated with a shorter length of hospital stay. Of all checklist items 21.8% were not performed while they could have been performed.

conclusionsChecklist answers do not accurately assess actual provided care. As actual performance of the antibiotic checklist items is associated with length of stay, efforts to increase actual performance appear to be justified.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsChecklistHospitalsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic managementChecklistsPerformance measuresQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID29310569
PMCPMC5759243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.