Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29310496›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Survey to identify depth of penetration of critical incident reporting systems in Austrian healthcare facilities.

Gerald Sendlhofer, Harald Eder, Karina Leitgeb, Roland Gorges, Heidelinde Jakse, Marianne Raiger, Silvia Türk, Walter Petschnig, Gudrun Pregartner, Lars-Peter Kamolz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Safety culture in the operating room-an overview].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  4. Incident reporting reduction during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary Italian hospital: A retrospective analysis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gerald Sendlhofer1 Resarch Unit for Safety in Health, Division of Plastic, Aeesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Deppartment of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Harald Eder2 Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS), Graz, Austria.
Karina Leitgeb2 Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS), Graz, Austria.
Roland Gorges2 Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS), Graz, Austria.
Heidelinde Jakse2 Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS), Graz, Austria.
Marianne Raiger2 Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS), Graz, Austria.
Silvia Türk2 Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS), Graz, Austria.
Walter Petschnig2 Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS), Graz, Austria.
Gudrun Pregartner8 Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Lars-Peter Kamolz1 Resarch Unit for Safety in Health, Division of Plastic, Aeesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Deppartment of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Gernot Brunner1 Resarch Unit for Safety in Health, Division of Plastic, Aeesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Deppartment of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incident reporting systems or so-called critical incident reporting systems (CIRS) were first recommended for use in health care more than 15 years ago. The uses of these CIRS are highly variable among countries, ranging from being used to report critical incidents, falls, or sentinel events resulting in death. In Austria, CIRS have only been introduced to the health care sector relatively recently. The goal of this work, therefore, was to determine whether and specifically how CIRS are used in Austria. A working group from the Austrian Society for Quality and Safety in Healthcare (ASQS) developed a survey on the topic of CIRS to collect information on penetration of CIRS in general and on how CIRS reports are used to increase patient safety. Three hundred seventy-one health care professionals from 274 health care facilities were contacted via e-mail. Seventy-eight respondents (21.0%) completed the online survey, thereof 66 from hospitals and 12 from other facilities (outpatient clinics, nursing homes). In all, 64.1% of the respondents indicated that CIRS were used in the entire health care facility; 20.6% had not yet introduced CIRS and 15.4% used CIRS only in particular areas. Most often, critical incidents without any harm to patients were reported (76.9%); however, some health care facilities also use their CIRS to report patient falls (16.7%), needle stick injuries (17.9%), technical problems (51.3%), or critical incidents involving health care professionals. CIRS are not yet extensively or homogeneously used in Austria. Inconsistencies exist with respect to which events are reported as well as how they are followed up and reported to health care professionals. Further recommendations for general use are needed to support the dissemination in Austrian health care environments.

Indexed as

AustriaDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient SafetyRisk ManagementCIRSdisseminationemployee safetyIncident reportingpatient safetysafetysurvey

Identifiers

PMID29310496
PMCPMC5798728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.